Testate Amoeba Communities of Epilithic Mosses and Lichens: New Data from Russia, Switzerland and Italy

Yuri A. Mazei,

Olga Belyakova,

Olimpia Coppellotti,

Richard J. Payne

The testate amoebae (TA) of many potential habitats around the world have been barely investigated but data on species presence and abundance is essential to answering big questions about microbial biogeography and the diversity of protist life. One such habitat lacking basic data is epilithic mosses and lichens with only a small number of samples analysed in previous studies and no systematic attempt to understand potential environmental controls. We use a large dataset (n = 81) from sites in Russia, Switzerland and Italy to demonstrate that testate amoebae in this habitat are both abundant and diverse. The community of our samples was dominated by ubiquitous taxa and differed between the northern (Russia) and southern (Switzerland and Italy) sites, perhaps due to differences in climate or air quality. Community composition, concentration and diversity were explained by moisture content but not by elevation above the ground surface and there were no significant differences between communities of mosses and lichens. Surprisingly our data showed a significant difference between communities of epiphytic and epilithic lichens in the same region sampled at the same time. Our study adds to the evidence that moisture availability is a critical factor in structuring testate amoeba communities across habitats and highlights the paucity of knowledge of TA in many environments.
Słowa kluczowe: Arcelllinida, Euglyphida, bryophytes, lichens, ecology, biogeography

Beyens L., Chardez D., De Landtsheer R., De Bock P., Jacques E. (1986) Testate amoebae populations from moss and lichen habitats in the Arctic. Polar Biol5: 165–173

Bray J. R., Curtis J. T. (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr27: 325–349

Charman D. J. (2001) Biostratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental applications of testate amoebae. Quaternary Sci. Rev20: 1753–1764

Clarke K. R. (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol18: 117–143

EMEP (2014) Transboundary particulate matter, photo-oxidants, acidifying and eutrophying components. EMEP Status Report 2014. Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo

Foissner W. (1999) Protist diversity: Estimates of the near-imponderable. Protist 150: 363–368

Gilbert D., Amblard C., Bourdier G., Francez A.-J. (1998a) The microbial loop at the surface of a peatland: structure, function, and impact of nutrient input. Microb. Ecol35: 83–93

Jassey V. E., Gilbert D., Binet P., Toussaint M. L., Chiapusio G. (2011) Effect of a temperature gradient on Sphagnum fallax and its associated living microbial communities: a study under controlled conditions. Can. J. Microbiol57: 226–235

Mazei Yu., Blinokhvatova Yu., Embulaeva E. (2011) Specific features of the microspatial distribution of soil testate amoebae in the forests of the Middle Volga Region. Arid Ecosystems 1: 46–52

Mazei Yu., Tsyganov A. (2006) Freshwater testate amoebae. KMK Sci Press, Moscow, 300 pp.

Meyer C., Gilbert D., Gillet F., Moskura M., Franchi M., Bernard N. (2012) Using “bryophytes and their associated testate amoeba” microsystems as indicators of atmospheric pollution. Ecol. Indicators 13: 144–151

Mitchell E. A. D., Bragazza L., Gerdol R. (2004) Testate amoebae (Protista) communities in Hylocomium splendens (Hedw.) BSG (Bryophyta): relationships with altitude, and moss elemental chemistry. Protist 155: 423–436

Mitchell E. A. D., Charman D. J., Warner B. G. (2008) Testate amoebae analysis in ecological and paleoecological studies of wetlands: past, present and future. Biodivers. Conserv17: 2115–2137

Nguyen-Viet H., Gilbert D., Bernard N., Mitchell E. A. D., Badot P. M. (2004) Relationship between atmospheric pollution characterized by NO2 concentrations and testate amoebae density and diversity. Acta Protozool43: 233–239

Payne R., Charman D. and Gauci V. (2010) The impact of simulated sulfate deposition on peatland testate amoebae. Microb. Ecol59: 76–83

Payne R. J., Mitchell E. A. D., Nguyen-Viet H., Gilbert D. (2012a) Can pollution bias peatland palaeoclimate reconstruction? Quaternary Res78: 170–173

Payne R. J., Thompson A., Field C., Standen V., Caporn S. J. M. (2012b) Impact of simulated nitrogen pollution on heathland microfauna, mesofauna and plants. Eur. J. Soil Biol49: 73–79

Payne R. J., Belyakova O., Mazei Y. (2015) Diversity and community ecology of forest epiphyte testate amoebae from European Russia. Eur. J. Protistol51: 450–459

Qin Y., Xie S., Smith H. G., Swindles G. T., Gu Y. (2011) Diversity, distribution and biogeography of testate amoebae in China: implications for ecological studies in Asia. Eur. J. Protistol47: 1–9

Ragon M., Fontaine M., Moreira D., Lopez-Garcia P. (2012) Different biogeographic patterns of prokaryotes and microbial eukaryotes in epilithic biofilms. Molecular Ecol21: 3852–3868

Smith H. G. (1992) Distribution and ecology of the testate rhizopod fauna of the continental Antarctic zone. Polar Biol12: 629–634

Todorov M., Golemansky V. (1996) Notes on Testate Amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) from Livingston Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctic. Bulgarian Antarctic Research: Life Sciences 1: 70

Wilkinson D. M., Mitchell E. A. D. (2010) Testate amoebae and nutrient cycling with particular reference to soils. Geomicrobiol. J27: 520–533

Czasopismo w darmowym dostępie.

Czasopismo ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.
Pierwotną formą czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna.