Do employment subcenters structure mobility patterns and land consumption? A global analysis for the main metropolitan areas in Spain

Carlos Marmolejo Durate,

Moria Tornés Fernández

Abstrakt

Subcentres are dense concentrations of employment and services that appear across contemporary metropolitan areas, the resulting urban pattern is called polycentric. Polycentrism has become the keystone in a major number of regional and urban policies, since it has been seen as a sustainable and equilibrated urban model. In this paper, using as case study the biggest metropolitan areas in Spain we test whether employment subcentres effectively structure mobility patterns around them, and at the same time whether polycentric urban patterns reduce land consumed around subcentres. For this reason we use effective urbanised area and travel to work mobility matrix to assess whether polycentrism increases the efficiency of urbanisation. The results suggest that effectively employment subcentres do structure travel to work patterns, reducing urban mobility, and consequently being structural places. Nevertheless, from the perspective of land consumption little effect is detected after controlling other urban factors affecting this vector such as orography and urban fabric fragmentation.

Słowa kluczowe: nvironmental sustainability, polycentrism, land consumption, excess commuting, Spain
References

Aguilera A., Mignot D., Growth in Commuting Distances in French Polycentric Metropolitan Areas: Paris, Lyon and Marseille, Urban Studies 42, 2004, 1537-1547.

Alonso W., Location and Land Use, Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press, 1964.

Anas A., Arnott R., Small K., Journal of Economic Literature 36, No. 3, 1998, 1426-1464.

Auken M., Report: On the impact of extensive urbanisation in Spain on individual rights of European citizens, on the environment and on the application of EU law, based upon petitions received, European Parliament, 2009.

Beaumont C., Ertur C., Le Gallo J., Spatial convergence clubs and the European growth process, 1980–1995, [in:] B. Fingleton (ed): European regional growth, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg New York 2004, 131-58. [6] Boix R., Trullén J., Polycentrism and urban structure: a critic review from the perspective of the research agenda, ACE: Architecture, City and Environment 6, 18, 2012.

Bontje M., From suburbia to post-suburbia in the Netherlands: potentials and threats for sustainable regional development, Journal of Housing and Built Environment 19 (1), 2004, 25-47.

Cervero R., K.L Wu, Polycentrism, commuting and residential location in the San Francisco Bay area, Environment and Planning A 29, 1997, 865-886.

Champion A.G., A changing demographic regime and evolving polycentric urban regions: consequences for the size, composition and distribution of city population, Urban Studies 38, No. 4, 2001, 657-667.

Clark C., Urban population densities, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 114, 1951, 490-496.

Garcia-Lopez M.A., Population suburbanization in Barcelona, 1991–2005: Is its spatial structure changing?, Journal of Housing Economics 19, 2010, 119-132. [12] Giuliano G., Small K.A., Is the Journey to Work Explained by Urban Structure?, Urban Studies 30, No. 9, 1993, 1485-1500.

Gordon H., Ricardson J., Giuiliano G., Travel Trends in non-CBD Activity Centres, Final Report, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U.S. Departament of Transportation, 1989. [14] Gordon P., Richardson H.W., Wong H.L., The distribution of population and employment in a polycentric city: the Case of Los Angeles, Environment and Planning A 18, 1986, 161-173.

Green N., Functional Polycentricity: A Formal Definition in Terms of Social Network Analysis, Urban Studies 44, No. 11, 2007, 2077-2103.

Griffith D.A., Modelling Urban Population Density in a Multi-centered City, Journal of Urban Economics 9, 1981, 298-310.

Heikkila E., Multicollinearity In Regression Models with Multiple Distance Measures, Journal of Regional Science 28, No. 3, 1988, 345-362.

Kau J.B., Lee C.F., Capital-land Substitution and urban land use, Journal of Regional Science 16 (1), 1976, 83-92.

Kloosterman R., Musterd S., The Polycentric Urban Region: Towards a Research Agenda, Urban Studies 38, No. 4, 2001, 623-633.

Marmolejo C., Masip J., Aguirre C., Policentrismo en el sistema urbano español: un análisis para 7 áreas metropolitanas, [En:] Ciudad y Territorio, Estudios Territoriales, 2012.

McDonald J.F., Econometric studies of urban population density: A survey, Journal of Urban Economics 26, 1989, 361-385.

McDonald J.F. & McMillen D.P., Employment Subcenters and Subsequent Real Estate Development in Suburban Chicago, Journal of Urban Economics 48 (1), 2000, 135-157.

McDonald J., Prather P., Suburban employment centres: The case of Chicago, Urban Studies 31, 1994, 201-218.

McMillen D., Non-Parametric Employment Subcenter Identification, Journal of Urban Economics 50, 2001, 448-473.

McMillen D., Employment subcenters in Chicago: Past, present, and future, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Economic Perspectives 2, 2003, 1-13.

McMillen D., Lester W., Evolving subcenters: employment and population densities in Chicago, 1970–2020, Journal of Housing Economics 12, 2003, 60-81.

Meijers E., Measuring Polycentricism and its Promises, European Planning Studies 16:9, 2008, 1313-1323.

Mills E.S., Hamilton B.W., Urban Economics, Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL, 1984.

Mills E., An Aggregative Model of Resource Allocation in a Metropolitan Area, American Economic Review LVII, No. 2, 1967, 197-210.

Mills E., The value of urban land in The Quality of the Urban Environment (H. Perloff, ed.), Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore 1969, 231-253.

Muñiz I., Galindo A., García-López M.A., Cubic Spline Density Functions and Satellite City Delimitation: The Case of Barcelona, Urban Studies 40, 2003, 1303-1321.

Muñiz I., García-López M.A., Galindo A., The Effect of Employment Subcentres on Population Density in Barcelona, Urban Studies 45, No. 3, 2008, 627-649.

Muth R., Cities and Housing, Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1969.

Pivo G., A Taxonomy of Suburban Office Clusters: The Case of Toronto, Urban Studies 30, No. 1, 1993, 31-49.

Schwanen T., Dijst M. and Dieleman F.M., Leisure Trips of Senior Citizens: Determinants of Modal Choice, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 92, 2008, 347-360.

Small, K., Song S., Population and Employment Densities: Structure and Change, Journal of Urban Economics 36, 1994, 292-313.

Stewart J., Suggested Principles of Social Physics, Science 106, 1947, 179-80.

Wachs M., Taylor B.D., Levine N., Ong P., The Changing Commute: A Case-study of the Jobs-Housing Relationship over Time, Urban Studies 30, No. 10, 1993, 1711-1729.

White M., Location Choice and Commuting Behavior in Cities with decentralized employment, Journal of Urban Economics 24, 1988, 129-152.