Noli Tangere – on touch

Monika Bogdanowska

Abstrakt

This paper discusses the issue of a physical interaction with the heritage of the past. Writing about monuments, the leading English theoretician of conservation John Ruskin stated that “we have no right whatever to touch them”. At the same time, the French restorer Violet le-Duc took a contrary stand encouraging his contemporaries to establish a creative interaction with the relics of the past. This controversy, which appeared more than 150 years ago, remains a key question – throughout history, societies claim their right to touch things motivating it in various manners. At the beginning of the 21st century, when traditional reality starts intermingling with the virtual world, we experience new dilemmas: do we really need physical contact with an authentic object if our perception can be satisfied by means of the multimedia? The human need for creation and experimentation may be realized outside physical reality. Perhaps it is the right time to resume the old dilemma. After all, we have the experiences of the 20th century behind and the pressing need to define our relation with historical objects ahead as long as we are willing to understand them. These ruminations will be illustrated with examples of the changing attitude towards the heritage of the past and such recent phenomena as commercialization or virtual reality.

Słowa kluczowe: theory of conservation, cultural heritage, philosophy of monument conservation-restoration
References

Biblia internetowa (http://www.biblia-internetowa.pl/Jan/20/17.html – dostęp: 20.08.2013).

Clark K., The Gothic Revival. An Essay in the History of Taste, wyd. 3, Penguin, Hermondsworth 1962.

Estreicher K., Odnowienie Collegium Maius, „Ochrona zabytków” 6/1953, nr 20.

Gałecka M., Straty i zniszczenia poniesione w zabytkach nieruchomych w okresie I wojny światowej na obszarze województwa lubelskiego (w jego aktualnych granicach), raport (opracowanie wykonane w ramach Programu MKiDN – opieka nad zabytkami), Lublin 2012 (maszynopis w posiadaniu Wojewódzkiego Urzędu ochrony Zabytków w Lublinie, sygn. 25383).

Garnham T., Oxford Museum. Deane and Woodward, Phaidon Press Ltd, London 1992.

Internet Archive, Full text “On Restoration” (http://archive.org/stream/onrestoration002597mbp/ onrestoration002597mbp_djvu.txt – dostęp: 20.08.2013).

Jokilehto J., A History of Architectural Conservation, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford 2005.

Koshar R., Preservation and the National Memory in the Twentieth Century, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill 1998.

Latham D., Creative Re-use of Buildings, vol. 1, Donhead, Shaftesbury 2000, XV.

Lebow V., The Real Meaning of Consumer Demand, “Journal of Retailing” Spring 1955; Scribd (http://pl.scribd.com/doc/965920/LebowArticle – dostęp: 20.08.2013).

Malraux A., Completant la legislation sur la protection du patrimoine historique et ésthetique de la France et tendant á faciliterla restauration immobiliére (http://www.malraux.org/index.php/varia/648-loimalraux1.html – dostęp: 20.08.2013).

Oxford University Museum, A Visitors’ Guide, The University Museum, Oxford 1990.

Riegl A., The Modern Cult of Monuments: Its Character and Its Origin, “Oppositions” 25, 1982.

Rosenberg J.D., The Genius of John Ruskin: Selection from His Writings, University of Virginia Press, London 1964.

Schwarz M., Wehdorn M., 101 Restaurierungen in Wien, Phoibos Verlag, Wien 2000.