Cezaropapizm a rzeczywistość Imperium Romanum IV–V wieku

Rafał Marek

Abstrakt

Caesaropapism and the Reality of the 4th–5th Century Roman Empire

The relationships between the secular authorities and the ecclesiastical hierarchy in the Roman Empire of the discussed epoch do not follow the simple pattern known as “caesaropapism”. or other similar models of sovereign’s supremacy over the church hierarchy within the “State church”. The reality was much more complex then, since a new model, known as “symphony” began to develop. The notion of “symphony” should be understood as a kind of close cooperation of both powers within the uniform Christian society. Popes strongly affi rmed the primacy of Rome within the church. At that time the theory of Pope Gelasius and the doctrine of St. Augustine played a prominent role. Nevertheless, these ideas were not widely received in the East. Later on, the Gelasian and Augustinian theories begun to be studied and appreciated in the scholastic milieu, where the new model of the relationship between the secular and papal power was developing.

Słowa kluczowe: władza świecka a władza kościelna, Kościół a Cesarstwo Rzymskie, prymat papieski w starożytności, cezaropapizm
References

[Maximi Confessoris], Relatio motionis, PG 90.109C–129C.

Acta Concicliorum Oecumenicorum, ed. E. Schwartz, R. Schiffer, Berlin et al. 1914–1984.

Acta Conciliorum Oecumenicorum s. secunda, ed. R. Riedinger, E. Lamberz, Berlin–New York, 1981–.

Ambroży, Epistolae extra collectionem, ed. M. Zelzer, CSEL vol. 82/3 (1982).

Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, ed. Ch. Upson Clark, J. Carew Rolfe, Cambridge 1935–1939.

Epistola decretalis papae Siricii, PL 13.1132; PL 56.555.

Epistolae Imperatorum Pontificum Aliorum Inde ab a. CCCLXVII usque DLIII datae Avellana Quae Dicitur Collectio, ed. O. Guenther, CSEL, 35 (2 vol.), 1895.

Euzebiusz z Cezarei, Vita Constantini, ed. F. Winkelmann, Berlin 1975.

Grzegorz z Nyssy, Mowa pogrzebowa cesarzowej Flacilli, PG 46.877–893.

Hermiasz Sozomen, Historia Ecclesiastica, PG 67.843–1724.

Jan Chryzostom, Homilia 3 do Mieszkańców Antiochii, PG 49.48–59.

Jan Chryzostom, Homilia 4 O Ozjaszu „Widziałem Pana”, PG 56.126.

Jan Chryzostom, Homilia 21, Ekloga o władzy cesarskiej, PG 49.211–222.

Jan Chryzostom, Homilia do Drugiego Listu do Koryntian, PG 61.381–391.

Jan Chryzostom, Przeciwko żydom i poganom, PG 48.813–838.

Justiniani Novellae[in:] Corpus Iuris Civilis, vol. III, ed. R. Scholl, W. Kroll, Berlin 1963.

Patrologiae Cursus Completus, ed. J.P. Migne, Series Graeca, Paris 1857–1866.

Patrologiae Cursus Completus, ed. J.P. Migne, Series Latina, Paris 1844–1855.

Sacrorum conciliorum, nova et amplissima collectio, ed. G.D. Mansi, Ph. Labbe, Graz 1960–1961 (repr.).

Sokrates z Konstantynopola, Historia Ecclesiastica, PG 67.30–842.

Theodoret, Historia Ecclesiastica, ed. L. Parmentier, Leipzig 1911.

Theodosiani Libri XVI, ed. Th. Mommsen, P.M. Meyer, J. Sirmond, Berlin 1905 (Codex Theodosianus).

Zosimos, Historia Nova, ed. I. Bekker, Bonn 1837.

Opracowania książkowe

Ahrweiler H., L’Ideologie politique de l’empire byzantin, Paris 1975.

Aland K., Kaiser und Kirche von Konstanz bis Byzanz, Berlin 1957.

Andresen C., Geschichte des christentums: Von den anfängen bis zur hochscholastik, Vol. 1, Stuttgart–Berlin–Köln–Mainz 1975.

Bardill J., Constantine, Divine Emperor of the Christian Golden Age, Cambridge–New York 2011.

Barnes T.D., Constantine and Eusebius, Cambridge 1981.

Barzano A., Il cristianesimo nelle leggi di Roma imperiale, Milan 1996.

Batiffol E., Cathedra Petri, Et. d’hist. anc. de l’Eglise, Paris 1938.

Batiffol E.,Le catholicisme des origines a S. Leon, 4 vol., Paris 1909–1924.

Baynes N.H., An Introduction to East Roman Civilization, Oxford 1948.

Beck H.G., Das Byzantinische Jahrtausend, Munich 1978.

Beck H.G., Geschichte der orthodoxen Kirche im byzantinischen Reich, Göttingen 1980.

Berkhof H., Kirche und Kaiser. Eine Untersuchung der Entstechung der byzantinischen und der theokratischen Staatsauffassung im vierten Jahrhundert, Zurich 1947.

Bermann H.J., Law and Revolution, Cambridge 1983.

Biondi B., Giustiniano primo principe e legislatore cattolico, Milano 1936.

Biondi B., Il diritto romano cristiano, vol. I, Milano 1952.

Blaise A., Chirat H., Dictionnaire latin français des auteurs chrétiens, Strasbourg 1954.

Böhmer J.H.,Iusecclesiasticumprotestantium:UsumhodiernumiuriscanoniciiuxtaseriemDecretaliumostendens et ipsis rerum argumentis illustrans, vol. 5, Halae Magdeburgicae 1756–1789.

Brehier L.,Hiereus kai Basileus, Memorial L. Petit, Archives de l’Orient Chretien, Bucharest 1948, s. 41–45.

Brehier L., Le Monde Byzantin, vol. 3, Paris 1947–1950.

Carranza A.R., El Triunfo del cristianismo: Estudios históricos, Buenos Aires 1950.

Chapman J., Studies in Early Papacy, London 1928.

Congar Y., After 900 Years: The Background of the Schism between the Eastern and Western Churches, New York 1959.

Congar Y., Jalons pour une theologie du laicat, Paris 1953.

Dagron G., Emperor and Priest: The Imperial Office in Byzantium, Cambridge–New York 2003.

Dagron G. i in. (red.), Historia chrześcijaństwa, t. 1, red. wyd. pol. J. Kłoczowski, przeł. M. Żurowska i in., Warszawa 1999.

Delmaire R. i in., Les lois religieuses des empereurs romains, vol. 1, Paris 2005, vol. 2, Paris 2009.

Dębiński A., Kościół i prawo rzymskie, Lublin 2008.

Duchesne L., Mathew A.H., The Churches Separated from Rome, New York–London 1907.

Dvornik F., Early Christian and Byzantine Political Philosophy, vol. 2, Washington 1966.

Ensslin W., Die Religionspolitik des Kaisers Theodosius d.Gr., München 1955.

Errington R.M., Roman Imperial Policy from Julian to Theodosius, Chapel Hill 2006.

Farin R., L’Imperio e l.Imperatore cristiano in Eusebio di Cesarea. La Prima teologia politica del cristianesimo, Zurich 1966.

Figgis J.N., The Political Aspects of S. Augustine’s “City of God”, London 1921.

Gallagher C., Canon Law and the Christian Community: The Role of law in the Church According to the Summa Aurea of Cardinal Hostiensis, Roma 1978.

Gaudemet J., Droit et société aux derniers siècles de l’Empire romain, Naples 1992.

Gaudemet J., Histoire du droit et des institutions de l’Eglise en Occident, vol. 18, Paris.

Gaudemet J., L’Eglise dans l’Empire romain (IVe–Ve siecles), Paris 1958.

Gaudemet J., Les gouvernants à Rome: Essais de droit public romain, Naples 1985.

Gaudemet J., Les Sources du droit de l’Église en Occident du IIe au VIIe siècle, Paris 1985.

Gaudemet J., Munier Ch., Conciles gaulois du IVe siècle, Paris 1977.

Gaudemet J., s.v. Theodosien (Code): Dictionnaire de droit canonique, t. 7, ed. R. Naz, Paris 1935–1965, kol. 1215 i n.

Grant R.M., Augustus to Constantine: The Rise and Triumph of Christianity in the Roman World, Louisville 2004.

Harries J., Law and Empire in Late Antiquity, Cambridge 1999.

Herrin J., The Formation of Christendom, Princeton 1987.

Hinschius P., Esposizione generale delle relazioni tra lo Stato e Chiesa, Torino 1892.

Horton F.L., The Melchizedek Tradition, Cambridge 1976.

Hussey J.M., The Orthodox Church in the Byzantine Empire, Oxford 2010.

Jalland T., The Church and the Papacy, London 1944.

Jones A.H.M., The Later Roman Empire 284–602: A Social, Economic and Administrative Survey (3 vols.), Oxford 1964.

Kidd B.J., The Roman Primacy to A.D. 461, London 1936.

King N.Q., The Emperor Theodosius and the Establishment of Christianity, London 1964.

Łach S., List do Hebrajczyków. Wstęp, przekład z oryginału, komentarz, ekskursy, Poznań 1959.

Le Bras G. red.), La formation du droit séculier et du droit de l’Eglise aux IVe et Ve siècles, Paris 1957.

Lo Grasso J., Ecclesia et Status (Fontes Selectae), Roma 1939.

Maccarrone M., Vicarius Christi: Storia del titοlοpapale(Lateranum, N.S. 18, 1–4 [Roma 1952]).

Maraval P., Le Christianisme de Constantin à la conquête arabe, Paris 1997.

Marrou H.I., History of Education in Antiquity, New York 1956.

McGuckin J.A., St. Cyril of Alexandria and the Christological Controversy: Its History, Theology and Texts, Leiden 1994 (repr. Crestwood NY St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press).

McGuckin J.A., The Orthodox Church: An Introduction to its History, Doctrine and Spiritual Culture, Oxford 2008.

McLynn N.B., Ambrose of Milan: Church and Court in a Christian Capital, Berkeley 1994.

Meslin M., Les Ariens d’Occident, Paris 1967.

Meyendorff J. (ed.), The Primacy of Peter: Essays in Ecclesiology and the Early Church, Crest­wood, NY 1992.

Michel O., Der Brief an die Hebräer, Göttingen 1975.

O’Meara J., Charter of Christendom: The significance of the City of God, New York 1961.

Ostrogorski G., History of the Byzantine State, New Brunswick, N.J. 1957.

Piganiol A., L’empire Chretien, Paris 1972.

Rahner H., Kościół i państwo we wczesnym chrześcijaństwie, przeł. M. Radożycka, J. Radozycki, Warszawa 1986.

Ratzinger J., Church, Ecumenism and Politics, San Francisco 2008.

Ritter A.M., Das Konzil von Konstantinopel und sein Symboll, Gottingen 1965.

Schmemann A., The Historical Road of Eastern Orthodoxy, New York 1963.

Schubert H.V., Geschichte der christlichen Kirche im Fruhmittelalter, Darmstadt 1976.

Scott S.H., The Eastern Churches and the Papacy, London 1928.

Sherrard Ph., Greek East and Latin West, London 1955.

Stein E., Histoire du Bas-Empire (2 vols.), Paris 1949–1959.

Tyszkiewicz S., Liesner K., Die Einheit der Kirche und Byzanz, Würzburg 1962.

Von Harnack A., Christus praesens – vicarius Christi, Berlin 1928.

Булгаков С., Православие. Очерки учения православной церкви, Paris1989.

Artykuły

Anastos M.V., Constantinople and Rome: A Survey of the Relations between the Byzantine and the Roman Churches, http://www.myriobiblos.gr/texts/english/milton1_2.html (dostęp: 15.02.2016).

Azkoul M., Sacerdotium et Imperium: The Constantinian Renovatio According to Greek Fathers, „Theological Studies” 1971, nr 52, s. 431–464.

Bowersock G.W., From Emperor to Bishop: The Self-Conscious Transformation of Political Power in the Fourth Century A.D.,„Classical Philology” 1986, nr 81, s. 298–307.

Burt D.X., Cain’s City [w:] Augustinus, De civitate Dei, ed. Ch. Horn, München 2010.

Dagron G., L’Empire romain d’Orient au IVe siecle et les traditions politiques de l’hellenisme: Le temoignage de Themistios, „Travaux et Memoires du Centre d’Histoire et Civilisation de Byzance” 1968, 3, s. 1–242.

Dagron G., Orient-Occident: Cesaropapisme et theorie des deux pouvoirs face a la modernite, „Revue d’ethique et de theologie morale” 2003, 227, Decembre, s. 143–157.

Dagron G., Vostocnij cezaropapism [w:] Gennadios, k 70-letiju akademika G.G. Litavrina (Melanges G.G. Litavrin), Moscou 1999, s. 80–99, http://www.krotov.info/libr_min/05_d/dag/ron_01.htm(dostęp: 10.01.2013).

De Giovanni L., Ortodossia, eresia, funzione dei chierchi. Aspetti e problemi della legislazione religosa tra Teodosia I e Teodosio II, „Atti della Acad. Rom. Const. Cez. Intern.” 1986, s. 59–76.

Dvornik F., Emperors, Popes and General Councils, „Dumbarton Oaks Papers” 1951, nr 6.

Eckmann A., Stosunek św. Augustyna do państwa rzymskiego [w:] Chrześcijanie a życie publiczne w Cesarstwie Rzymskim III–IV wieku, red. J. Śrutwa, Lublin 1988, s. 213–262.

Gaudemet J., Droit Romain et Droit Canonicque en Occident aux IVe et Ve siecles [w:] Actes du Congres de Droit Canonique, IV 1947, Paris 1950, s. 254–267.

Gaudemet J., L’Édit de Thessalonique. Police locale ou declaration de principe? [w:] Aspects of the Fourth Century A.D., Proceeding of the Symposium Power & Possession. State, Society and Church in the Fourth Century A.D., ed. H.W. Pleket, A.F.M. Verhoogt, Leiden 1997, s. 43–51.

Geanakoplos D.J., Church and State in the Byzantine Empire: A Reconsideration of the Problem of Caesaropapism, „Church History” 1965, vol. 34, no. 4, December, s. 381–403.

Goldmann E., Graecus = Gebildet, Brussels 1937, s. 399–409.

Guilland R., La vie scholarie a Byzance, Bull. Assoc. G. Bude, III, 1953, s. 63–83.

Karatschow A., Die Entstehung der kaiserlichen Synodalgewalt unter Konstanin dem Grossem, ihre theologische Begrundung und ihre kirchliche Rezeption,„Kirche und Kosmos, Orthodoxes und Evangelisches Christentum, Studienheft” 1950, No. 2, s. 137–152.

Lorenz R., Das Vierte bis sechste Jahrundert [w:] Die Kirche in ihrer Geschichte,ed.
K.D. Schmidt, E. Wolf, Gottingen 1970.

McGuckin J.A., The Legacy of the Thirteenth Apostle: Origins of the East-Christian Conceptions of Church-State Relation, „St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly” 2003, 47 (3–4), s. 251–288.

Meyendorff J., Justinian, The Empire and The Church, „Dumbarton Oaks Papers” 1968, vol. 22, s. 45–60.

Michalik P., Kilka uwag na temat cezaropapizmu w Cesarstwie Wschodniorzymskim i Bizantyńskim [w:] Cuius regio eius religio?, red. G. Górski i in., Lublin 2006, s. 83–90.

Paciorek P., Christ and Melchizedek both Fatherless and Motherless in the Christology of Augustine of Hippo [w:] F. Young, M. Edwards, P. Parvis, Studia Patristica, vol. XLIII, Louvain 2006, s. 213–219.

Papanikolau A., Byzantium, Orthodoxy, and Democracy, „Journal of the American Academy of Religion” 2003, nr 71 (1), s. 75–98.

Pennington K., Caesaropapism [w:] The New Catholic Encyclopedia: Supplement 2010, vol. 1, Detros. 183–185.

Sansterre J.M., Eusebe de Cesaree et la naissance de la theorie „cesaropapiste”, „Byzantion” 1972, nr 42, s. 131–195, 532–594.

Schilling R., A propos du Pontifex Maximus. Dans quelle mesure peut-on parler d’un emploi par les chretiens d’un titre prestigieux de la Rome antique? [w:] Diritto e religione da Roma e Costantinopoli e Mosca. Da Roma alle Terza Roma. XI Seminario internazionale di studi storici, Roma 21–22 avril 1991, Roma 1994, s. 75–90.

Straub J., Constantine as KOINOS EPISKOPOS, „Dumbarton Oaks Papers” 1967, nr 21, s. 37–55.

Straub J., Kaiser Konstantin als EPISKOPOS TON EKTOS, „Studia Patristica” 1957, nr 1,
s. 678–695.

Toubert P., La theorie gelasienne des deux pouvoirs. Propositions en vue d’une revision [w:] Studi in onore di Giosue Musce, ed. C. Damiani Fonsceca, V. Sivo, Bari 2000, s. 519–540.

Watt J.A., The Use of the Term „plenitudo potestatis” by Hostiensis [w:] Monumenta Iuris Canonici: Subsidia, Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Medieval Canon Law,
ed. S. Kuttner, Vatican City 1969, s. 161–187.

Williams G.H., Christology and Church-State Relations in the Fourth Century, „Church History” 1951, vol. 20, iss. 4, December, s. 3–26.

Ziegler A.W., Die byzantinische Religionspolitik und der sog. Cesaropapismus [w:] Munchener Beitrage zur Slavenkunde. Festgabe fur Paul Diels, Munich 1953, s. 81–97.

Kwartalnik ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.
Pierwotną wersją czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna publikowana w internecie.