Linguistic profi les: A quantitative approach to theoretical questions

Laura A. Janda

Abstrakt

A major challenge in linguistics today is to take advantage of the data and sophisticated
analytical tools available to us in the service of questions that are both theoretically interesting
and practically useful. I offer linguistic profi les as one way to join theoretical insight
to empirical research. Linguistic profi les are a more narrowly targeted type of behavioral
profi ling, focusing on a specifi c factor and how it is distributed across language forms.
I present case studies using Russian data and illustrating three types of linguistic profi ling
analyses: grammatical profi les, semantic profi les, and constructional profi les. In connection
with each case study I identify theoretical issues and show how they can be operationalized
by means of profi les. The fi ndings represent real gains in our understanding of Russian
grammar that can also be utilized in both pedagogical and computational applications.

Słowa kluczowe: cognitive linguistics, linguistic profi les, statistical analysis, theoretical linguistics
References

Comrie B., 1976, Aspect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Divjak D., Gries S. Th., 2006, Ways of trying in Russian: Clustering behavioral profi les,
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2, p. 23–60.
Dostál A., 1954, Studie o vidovém systému v staroslověnštině, Prague: Státní pedagogické
nakladatelství.
Eckhoff H. M., Janda L. A., 2014, Grammatical Profi les and Aspect in Old Church Slavonic,
Transactions of the Philological Society, Vol. 112, Issue 2, p. 231–258.
Endresen A., Janda L. A., Kuznetsova J., Lyashevskaya O., Makarova A., Nesset T.,
Sokolova S., 2012, Russian ‘purely aspectual’ prefi xes: Not so ‘empty’ after all?,
Scando-Slavica, 58:2, p. 231–291.
Evans N., Levinson S., 2009, The myth of language universals: Language diversity and
its importance for cognitive science, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, p. 429–492.
Firth J. R., 1957, A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955 [in:] J. R. Firth et al. (eds.),
Studies in Linguistic Analysis, (Philological Society), Oxford: Blackwell, p. 1–32.
Frank S. L., Bod R., Christiansen M. H., (2012), How hierarchical is language use?,
Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279, p. 4522–4531.
Geeraerts D., Grondelaers S., Speelman D., 1999, Convergentie en divergentie in de
Nederlandse woordenschat. Een onderzoek naar kleding- en voetbaltermen, Amsterdam.
Gries S. Th., Divjak D., 2009, Behavioral profi les: a corpus-based approach towards cognitive
semantic analysis [in:] V. Evans, S. S. Pourcel (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive
Linguistics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, p. 57–75.
Hanks P., 1996, Contextual dependency and lexical sets, International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics, 1, p. 75–98.
Harris Z. S., 1970, Papers in structural and transformational linguistics, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Janda L. A., 2013, Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Linguistics [in:] L. A. Janda (ed.),
Cognitive Linguistics: The Quantitative Turn. The Essential Reader, Berlin: De Gruyter
Mouton, p. 1–32.
Janda L. A., 2015, Cognitive linguistics in the year 2015, Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1,
p. 131–154.
Janda L. A., Lyashevskaya O., 2011, Grammatical profi les and the interaction of the lexicon
with aspect, tense and mood in Russian, Cognitive Linguistics, 22:4, p. 719–763.
Janda L. A., Lyashevskaya O., 2013, Semantic Profi les of Five Russian Prefi xes: po-, s-,
za-, na-, pro-, Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 21 (2), p. 211–258.
Janda L. A., Solovyev V., 2009, What Constructional Profi les Reveal About Synonymy:
A Case Study of Russian Words for SADNESS and HAPPINESS, Cognitive Linguistics,
20 (2), p. 367–393.
Kuznetsova J., 2013, Linguistic Profi les. Correlations between Form and Meaning. PhD
dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Nesset T., Endresen A., Janda L. A., 2011, Two ways to get out: Radial Category Profi ling
and the Russian Prefi xes vy- and iz-, Zeitschrift für Slawistik, 56:4, p. 377–402.
Sokolova S., Janda L. A., Lyashevskaya O., 2012, The Locative Alternation and the Russian
‘empty’ prefi xes: A case study of the verb gruzit’ ‘load’ [in:] D. Divjak, St. Th. Gries
(eds.), Frequency effects in language representation, (Trends in Linguistics. Studies
and Monographs, 244.2), 2012, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, p. 51–86.
Speelman D., Grondelaers S., Geeraerts D., 2003, Profi le-Based Linguistic Uniformity as
a Generic Model for Comparing Language Varieties, Computers and the Humanities,
37 (3), p. 317–337.
Timberlake A., 2004, A Reference Grammar of Russian, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Падучева Е. В., 1996, Семантические исследования. Семантика времени и вида
в русском языке. Семантика нарратива, Москва: Языки русской культуры.