The Philosophical Assumptions behind the Non-Cognitive Use of Scriptures in Eastern Religions

Andrei G. Zavaliy

Abstrakt

It is well-known that sacred scriptures play a dual role in many religions – cognitive (or informative) and non-cognitive (or performative). Arguably, the non-cognitive use of scriptures is especially prominent in Eastern Religions, such as Hinduism and Buddhism. The use of a text as a talisman to ward off evil forces, the uttering of mantras and sacred formulas, and the spinning of the “prayer wheels” containing scrolls of paper with excerpts from various sutras, are all examples of the use of the religious text in a non-cognitive manner. The paper aims to examine the philosophical background of such practices, and to identify the implicit metaphysical assumptions that allow the practitioners to use the word, whether in its written or spoken forms, as a sacred ritual object with real powers. The Mimamsa school from the Hindu tradition and the Shingon sect of Japanese Buddhism are selected as representative examples, and their respective approaches to language are examined. My further goal is to encourage a fresh look at the Eastern religious traditions, where local practices are not evaluated and categorised according to western standards, but are rather approached from the philosophical background of an indigenous tradition per se.

Słowa kluczowe: Eastern Religions, Hinduism, Buddhism, Kūkai, Shingon, Mantra, Non-cognitive use of scriptures
References

1. Abe R.,The Weaving of the Mantra: Kūkai and the Construction of Esoteric Buddhist Discourse, New York 1999.

2. Alper H., Mantra. Albany & New York 1989.

3. Austin J. L., How to Do Things with Words, Cambridge 1975.

4. Beck G. L., Sonic Theology: Hinduism and Sacred Sound, Chicago 1993.

5. Billimoria P. P., Sabdapramana: Word and Knowledge: A Doctrine in Mimamsa–Nyaya Philosophy, Boston 1988.

6. Blum M. L., The Origins and Development of Pure Land Buddhism, Oxford 2002.

7. Burchett P. E., The ‘Magical’ Language of Mantra, “Journal of the American Academy of Religion” no. 76 (4/2008), p. 807–843.

8. Coward H., The Perfectability of Human Nature in Eastern and Western Thought, Albany 2008.

9. Coward H. and Goa D., Mantra: Hearing the Divine in India and America, New York 2004.

10. Derrida J., Of Grammatology, Baltimore & London 1997.

11. The Rig Veda, ed. W. Doniger, Harmondsworth 2005.

12. Gomez L., The Whole Universe as a Sutra, [in:] Buddhism in Practice, ed. D. Lopez, Princeton 1995, p. 107–111.

13. Groner P., Saicho: The Establishment of the Japanese Tendai School, Honolulu 2000.

14. Hakeda Y. S., Kūkai and His Major Works, New York 1972.

15. Johnston S. I., Describing the Undefinable: New Books on Magic and Old Problems of Definition, “History of Religions” no. 43, 2004, p. 50–54.

16. Kohn L., The “Tao–te–ching” in Ritual, [in:] Lao-tzu and Tao-te-ching, ed. L. Kohn and M. LaFargue, Albany 1998, p. 143–61.

17. Malinowski B, Coral Gardens and Their Magic, Vol. 2, Bloomington 1965.

18. Padoux A., Tantric Mantras: Studies on Mantrasastra, London & New York 2011.

19. Saussure F., Course in General Linguistics, London 2013 (reprint).

20. Searle J. R., Speech Acts, Cambridge 1970.

21. Staal F., Discovering the Vedas, New Delhi 2008.

22. Staal F., Oriental Ideas on the Origin of Language, “Journal of the American Oriental Society” no. 99 (1/1979), p. 1–14.

Czasopismo ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.
Pierwotną formą czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna.