Sleep, Static Films and the Displacement of Attention and Distraction

Vincent Baptist

Abstrakt

Categorized as both an instance of ‘durational cinema’ and ‘cinema of stasis’, this paper takes Andy Warhol’s 1963 film Sleep as case study to investigate how the seemingly opposed spectatorial modes of attention and distraction are installed in contemplative film works. This conceptual inquiry is initially enabled by aligning Jonathan Crary’s critical analysis of the contemporary homogenization of perceptual experience with Johanna Drucker’s investigation of conceptions of art. Yet, considering certain historical insights with regard to durational aesthetics and the spectatorial experiences that these elicit, it subsequently becomes necessary to also consider the ways in which a static film potentially stimulates or enables disruption and distraction. Walter Benjamin and Siegfried Kracauer form the theoretical counterparts to Crary and Drucker, through which the juxtaposition between attention and distraction can be explicated more fully. Ultimately, by means of additional contextual information on Warhol’s film, it is possible to characterize the apparent experiential paradox between attention and distraction that underlies Sleep as a confl icting, yet reciprocal bond.

Słowa kluczowe: Attention, distraction, stasis, sleep, Andy Warhol
References

Benjamin W., “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” (1936), transl. by H. Zohn, in: W. Benjamin, Illuminations, ed. by H. Arendt, New York: Schocken Books, 1968.

Crary J., 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep, London & New York: Verso, 2013. 

Drucker J., “Art”, in: Critical Terms for Media Studies, ed. by W.J.T. Mitchell, M.B.N. Hansen, Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 2010.

Five Dedicated to Ozu (2003, Abbas Kiarostami).

I Don’t Want to Sleep Alone (2006, Tsai Ming-liang).

Joseph B.W., “The Play of Repetition: Andy Warhol’s Sleep”, Grey Room 2005, no. 19.

Kracauer S., “Cult of Distraction: On Berlin’s Picture Palaces” (1926), transl. by T.Y. Levin, New German Critique 1987, no. 40.

Lim S.H., “Temporal Aesthetics of Drifting: Tsai Ming-liang and a Cinema of Slowness”, in: Slow Cinema, ed. by T. de Luca, N. Barradas Jorge, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.

Lim S.H., Tsai Ming-liang and a Cinema of Slowness, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2014.

Merleau-Ponty M., “The Film and the New Psychology” (1948), transl. by H.L. Dreyfus, P. Allen Dreyfus, in: M. Merleau-Ponty, Sense and Non-Sense, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964.

Remes J., “Motion(less) Pictures: The Cinema of Stasis”, British Journal of Aesthetics 2012, vol. 52, iss. 3.

Remes J., Motion(less) Pictures: The Cinema of Stasis, New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.

Remes J., “Serious Immobilities: Andy Warhol, Erik Satie and the Furniture Film”, Screen 2014, vol. 55, iss. 4.

Remes J., “The Sleeping Spectator: Non-Human Aesthetics in Abbas Kiarostami’s Five: Dedicated to Ozu”, in: Slow Cinema, ed. by T. de Luca, N. Barradas Jorge, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.

Schoonover K., “Wastrels of Time: Slow Cinema’s Laboring Body, the Political Spectator, and the Queer”, Framework 2012, vol. 53, no. 1.

Sleep (1963, Andy Warhol).

Umberto D. (1952, Vittorio De Sica).

Walsh M., “The First Durational Cinema and the Real of Time”, in: Slow Cinema, ed. by T. de Luca, N. Barradas Jorge, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.

Pierwotną wersją czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna publikowana
kwartalnie w internecie. Czasopismo ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.