Visual Culture, Photography and the Urban: An Interpretive Framework

Gillian Rose

Abstrakt

This article offers a framework for understanding and refl ecting upon the various ways that urban scholars have worked with visual representations of city spaces. It suggests that there are three main approaches: representing the urban, evoking the urban and performing the urban. The paper discusses the methodological implications of each of these.

Słowa kluczowe: photography, urban, visual culture, methodology
References

Appadurai A., The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1986.

Barthes R., Camera Lucida, transl. R. Howard, Jonathan Cape, London 1982.

Bennett J., The Enchanted World of Modernity: Paracelsus, Kant, and Deleuze, “Cultural Values” 1997, no. 1 (1), pp. 1–28.

Böhme G., Atmosphere as the Fundamental Concept of a New Aesthetics, “Thesis Eleven” 1993, vol. 36, no. 1.

Böhme G., Atmosphere as the Fundamental Concept of a New Aesthetics, “Thesis Eleven” 1993, no. 1 (36), pp. 113–126.

Böhme G., Contribution to the Critique of the Aesthetic Economy, “Thesis Eleven” 2003, no. 1 (73).

Burgess J., Green J., YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture, Polity, Cambridge 2009.

Coover R., The Digital Panorama and Cinemascapes, [in:] T. Bartscherer, R. Coover (eds.), Thinking Through Digital Technology in the Humanities and the Arts, Chicago University Press, Chicago 2011.

Edensor T., Industrial Ruins: Spaces, Aesthetics, and Materiality, Berg, Oxford 2005.

Edwards E., The Camera as Historian: Amateur Photographers and Historical Imagination, 1885–1918, Duke University Press, Durham, NC 2012.

Elsheshtawy Y., Dubai: Behind an Urban Spectacle, Routledge, London 2010.

Elwood S., Leszczynski A., New Spatial Media, New Knowledge Politics, “Transactions of the Insti tute of British Geographers” 2013, vol. 38, no. 4.

Graham M., Zook M., Boulton A., Augmented Reality in Urban Places: Contested Content and the Duplicity of Code, “Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers” 2013, vol. 38, no. 3.

Hansen M.B.N., New Philosophy for a New Media, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2004.

Kitchin R., Gleeson J., Dodge M., Unfolding Mapping Practices: A New Epistemology for Cartography, “Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers” 2013, vol. 38, no. 3.

Miller V., New Media, Networking and Phatic Culture, “Convergence: the International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies” 2008, vol. 14, no. 4.

Pink S., Doing Sensory Ethnography, 2nd ed., Sage, London 2009.

Pred A., Recognizing European Modernities: A Montage of the Present, Routledge, London 1995.

Rose G., The Question of Method: Practice, Reflexivity and Critique in Visual Culture Studies, [in:] I. Heywood, B. Sandywell (eds.), The Handbook of Visual Culture, Berg, Oxford 2012, pp. 542–558.

Rose G., Visual Methodologies: Interpreting Visual Materials, 3rd ed., Sage, London 2011.

Spencer S., Visual Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Awakening Visions, Routledge, London 2011.

Suchar C.S., Grounding Visual Sociology in Shooting Scripts, “Qualitative Sociology” 1997, no. 20, pp. 33–55.

Thrift N., Lifeworld Inc – and What to Do about It, “Environment and Planning D: Society and Space” 2011, no. 1 (29), pp. 5–26.

Thrift N., The Insubstantial Pageant: Producing an Untoward Land, “Cultural Geographies” 2012, no. 2 (19), pp. 141–168.

Wilson M.W., Graham M., Neogeography and Volunteered Geographic Information: A Conversation with Michael Goodchild and Andrew Turner, “Environment and Planning A” 2013, vol. 45, no. 1.

Pierwotną wersją czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna publikowana
kwartalnie w internecie. Czasopismo ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.