Zarys modelu krajowych systemów realizacji projektów publicznych

Stanisław Gasik

A Framework for National Public Projects Implementation Systems
Public project management is one of the most important areas of operations of contemporary public government institutions. All investments and many public services are performed as projects. The public projects implementation capability significantly influences national economies development. Up to now there exist no model of national public projects implementation systems. Papers dealing with public projects analyze them from the point of view of single projects or institutions. The article presents the first proposal of defining a framework model of national public projects implementation systems. Such system consists of six interrelated areas: the portfolio management area, the institutions area, the processes and methodologies area, the knowledge management area, the public projects actors area, and the development of national public projects implementation systems. The presented framework is of descriptive type – it was developed as the result of an analysis of solutions in this area performed in over 90 countries.
Słowa kluczowe: administracja publiczna, zarządzanie projektami

AGIMO Australia (2013), Two Pass Review Process, ICT Australian Government Information Management Office, Department of Finance and Deregulation, Canberra, Australia [dostęp: 09.2013].

ANAO (2011), Management of the Implementation of New Policy Initiatives, Audit Report No.29 2010-11. Canberra, Australia, [dostęp: 09.2013].

Barker K. (2004), Delivering Stability: Securing our Future Housing Needs,, London, UK [dostęp: 09.2013].

Brewer J.K., Smith S.A., Sandeen A.V. (2013), 2013 Statewide Strategic IT Plan. Plan for
the Future
, Arizona Strategic Enterprise Technology, Arizona Department of Administration, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, [dostęp: 09.2013].

Cabinet Office (2013), Policy Managing major projects more effectively, Cabinet Office and Efficiency and Reform Group, London, UK, [dostęp: 09.2013].

COT California (2013), California Project Management Methodology, California Department of Technology, Sacramento, Kalifornia, USA, [dostęp: 10.2013].

DB Hong Kong (2013), Development Bureau, Hong Kong, [dostęp: 09.2013].

DoF Australia (2013a), Gateway Review Process, Department of Finance, Canberra, [dostęp: 10.2013].

DoF Australia (2013b), Risk Potential Assessment Tool, Department of Finance, Canberra, Australia, [dostęp: 09.2013].

DoFD Australia (2012), Organisational Project Management Maturity Assessment, Department of Finance and Deregulation, Canberra, Australia, [dostęp: 09.2013].

DSD WA (2013), Department of State Development, Perth, Western Australia, [dostęp: 09.2013].

DTMB Michigan (2013a), have New Project. Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget, Lansing, Michigan, USA,,5552,7-150-56355_56581_31294---,00.html [dostęp: 10.2013].

DTMB Michigan (2013b), IT Project Management Certification Program Handbook, Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget, Lansing, Michigan, USA,5552,7-150-56355_56581-95236--,00.html [dostęp: 10.2013].

EPMO Kansas (2008), Project Management Methodology. Appendix E. Information Technology Policy 2530 – Project Management, Enterprise Project Management Office, Office of Information Technology Services, Topeka, Kansas, USA [dostęp: 10.2013].

EPMO Vermont (2013), Enterprise Project Management Office Charter, Department of Information and Innovation. Montpelier, Vermont, USA, [dostęp: 09.2013].

ExpoTrade (2013), 4th Annual WA Major Projects Conference 2013, Perth, Western Australia, [dostęp: 10.2013].

Flyvbjerg B. (2007), Cost Overruns and Demand Shortfalls in Urban Rail and Other Infrastructure, „Transportation Planning and Technology”, vol. 30, s. 9–30.

Gasik S. (2011), Model of Project Knowledge Management, „Project Management Journal”, vol. 42, no. 3, s. 23–44.

Hall M., Holt R. (2002), U.K. Public Sector Project Management – Cultural Perspective, „Public Performance and Management Review”, vol. 25, s. 298–312.

JKRM Malaysia (2013), Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, [dostęp: 09.2013].

Kassel D.S. (2010), Managing Public Sector Projects: Strategic Framework for Success in an Era of Downsized Government, CRC Press, Boca Raton.

Latham M. (1994), Constructing the Team, HMSO, London.

Mays G., Bromead K. (2012), 2011 Customer Satisfaction Survey, Enterprise Project Management Office. Office of the State Chief Information Officer, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, [dostęp: 10.2013].

MPA UK (2013), Major Projects Authority, London, Wielka Brytania, [dostęp: 09.2013].

MPFU Australia (2013), Major Projects Facilitation Unit, Department of Infrastructure and Transport, Canberra, Australia, [dostęp: 09.2013].

MP Victoria (2013), Major Projects, Department of State Development, Business and Innovation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, [dostęp: 09.2013].

NYS Forum (2013), Project Management Working Group, The NYS Forum, Inc. Albany, New York, USA, [dostęp: 10.2013].

OGC (2007), The OGC Gateway™ Process. Manager’s Checklist. The Stationery Office, London, U.K.

OIMT Hawaii (2013), Hawai`i’s Top Ten Transformation Programs, Office of Information Management and Technology, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, [dostęp: 10.2013].

OIT Maine (2004), Information Technology Portfolio Management Policy. Office of Information Technology, Augusta, Maine, USA [dostęp: 10.2013].

OIT Maine (2009), Information Technology Project Management Policy, Office of Information Technology, Augusta, Maine, USA, [dostęp: 10.2013].

OMB (2013), Office of Management and BudgetWashington, USA, [dostęp: 09.2013].

PAF QTF Queensland (2013), Project Assurance Framework, Projects Queensland, Queensland Treasury and Finance, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia [dostęp: 10.2013].

PDD Vermont (2013), Program Development Division, Agency of Transportation, Montpelier, Vermont, USA, [dostęp: 09.2013].

PMI (2006), Government Extension to the PMBOK® Guide Third Edition, Project Management Institute, Newton Square, Pennsylvania, USA.

PMI (2013), Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Newton Square, Pennsylvania, USA.

PM Missouri (2013), Project Management. Facilities Management, Design and Construction, Office of Administration, Jefferson City, Missouri, USA, [dostęp: 09.2013].

PMO Maine (2013), Cross Functional Work Flow Document, Project Management Office, Maine Office of Information Technology, Augusta, Maine, USA, [dostęp: 10.2013].

PMRC Michigan (2004), State of Michigan Project Management Methodology, Project Management Resource Center, Michigan Department of Information Technology, Lansing, Michigan, USA, [dostęp: 10.2013].

POCD California (2013), Department of Technology, Sacramento, California, USA, [dostęp: 09.2013].

PS NSW (2013), Project Services, Public Works, Sydney, Nowa Południowa Walia, Australia, [dostęp: 09.2013].

PSPMF (2013), Public Sector Project Management Forum, Regional Municipality of Durham, Durham, Ontario, Kanada, [dostęp: 10.2013].

QAT Texas (2013), Quality Assurance Team, State Auditor’s Office, Austin, Texas, USA, [dostęp: 09.2013].

RCI (2004), Ustawa dnia 29 stycznia 2004 r. Prawo zamówień publicznych, Dz.U. 2004 Nr 19, poz. 177.

SSC New Zealand (2011), Guidance for Monitoring Major Projects and Programmes, State Services Commission, Wellington, New Zealand, [dostęp: 10. 2013].

SSC New Zealand (2013), Gateway Review Process, State Services Commission, Wellington, New Zealand, [dostęp: 10.2013].

University of Oxford (2012), Oxford Teams up with Cabinet Office to Teach Leadership, University of Oxford, Oxford, Wielka Brytania [dostęp: 10.2013].

White House (1993), Government Performance Results Act, The White House, Washington, USA,, modyfikacja: [dostęp: 09.2013].

VITA Virginia (2013), Best Practices and Lessons Learned, Virginia Information Technologies Agency, Richmond, Virginia, USA, [dostęp: 10.2013].

Wirick D.W. (2009), Public-Sector Project Management: Meeting the Challenges and Achieving Results, Hoboken, Wiley and PMI.

WSDoT Washington (2013a), Project Management – Delivering the Capital Construction Programs at the Project Level, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, Washington, USA, [dostęp: 10.2013].

WSDoT Washington (2013b), Washington State Department of Transportation Management Principles, Olympia, Washington, USA, [dostęp: 10.2013].

Kwartalnik ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.
Pierwotną wersją czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna publikowana w internecie.