Pricking the male bubble in academia – exploration of female academic experiences in a number of Pakistan universities

Zainab Fakhr,

Silvia Dal Bianco,

Shazia Bilal

Abstrakt
The purpose of this study is to identify some relevant key themes, which have emerged from a fieldwork on female academics in Pakistan, which was conducted between 2015 and 2016. The focus of the present research is to explore the experiences of female academic staff in a number of selected Higher Education institution. The investigation goes beyond the formal contractual role boundaries, such as job scope and requirements, and it analyses female academics’ experiences in a holistic sense. This is in recognition that the value of female employees is not only defined by the nature of their work roles but also by societal as well as cultural norms. To this end, the analysis of female career progression, in the context of a ‘conservative and gendered society’, is complemented to the ones of work-life conflict and multiple identities. As for its methodology, the analysis employs qualitative research techniques, such as interviews leading to a thematic analysis of the generated data. Our preliminary results are consistent with the established literature, in so far as they show significant work-life conflict, slower career progression and fewer development and progression opportunities for female academics.
Słowa kluczowe: Female academics, Pakistan, social inclusion, cultural context, multiple identities
References

Bagilhole B., White K. (eds.), (2011), Gender, Power and Management: Cross Cultural Analysis of Higher Education, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Baumgartner M.S., Schneider D.E. (2010), Perceptions of Women in Management: Thematic Analysis of Razing the Glass Ceiling, “Journal of Career Development”, 37, 559–576.

Bryman A., Bell J. (2015), Business Research Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Cockburn C. (1991), In the way of Women: Men’s Resistance to Sex Equality in Organizations, Macmillan, London.

Collins P.H. (1986), Learning from the Outsider within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought, “Social Problems”, 33 (6), S14–S32.

Czarnowsky M. (2008), Learning’s Role in Employee Engagement: An ASTD Research Study, American Society for Training and Development, Arlington, VA.

Guest G., MacQueen N. (2012), Introduction to Thematic Analysis: Applied Thematic Analysis, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Handley J. (1994), Women, Decision Making and Academia: An Unholy Alliance, “Women in Management Review”, 9, 3, 11–16.

Haraway D. (2000), Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist: Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century, “The Cybercultures Reader”, 291, Routledge, London.

HEC (2012), Higher Education Commission, Pakistan Report.

Hill Collins P. (1986), Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought, “Social Problems”, 33, 6, Special Theory Issue (Oct.–Dec.), S14–S32.

Kanter R.M. (1977), Men and Women of the Corporation, Basic Books, New York.

Malik S., Courtney K. (2011), Higher Education and Women’s Empowerment in Pakistan, “Gender and Education”, 23 (1), 29–45.

Mavin S. (2001), The Gender Culture Kaleidoscope: Images of Women’s Identity and Place in Organization, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Northumbria, Newcastle.

Mavin S., (2006), Venus Envy 2: Sisterhood, Queen Bees and Female Misogyny in Management, “Women in Management Review”, 21, 5, 349–364.

Mavin S. (2008), Queen Bees, Wannabees and Afraid to Bees: No More ‘Best Enemies’ for Women in Management?, “British Journal of Management”, 19, S75–S84.

Mavin S., Bryans P., Waring T. (2004), Gender on the Agenda 2: Unlearning Gender Blindness in Management Education, “Women in Management”, 19, 6, 293–303.

Morley L., Crossouard B. (2015), Women in Higher Education Leadership in South Asia: Rejection, Refusal, Reluctance, Revisioning, British Council, University of Sussex, Brighton.

Ramazanoglu C., Holland J. (2007), Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices, Sage, London.

Saunders M., Lewis P., Thornhill A. (2013), Research Methods for Business Students, 6th Edition, Oxford.

Shuck B., Wollard K. (2010), Employee Engagement and HRD: Seminal Review of the Foundations, “Human Resource Development Review”, 9, 89–110.

Staines G., Travis C., Jayerante T.E. (1973), The Queen Bee Syndrome, “Psychology Today”, 7, 8, 55–60.

Priola V. (2004), Gender and Feminine Identities – Women as Managers in UK Academic Institution, “Women in Management Review”, 19, 8, 421–430.

Rab M. (2014), British Council, Pakistan cited, http://blog.britishcouncil.org/2014/03/16/what-higher-education-reforms-have-done-for-pakistans-women/ [access: 20.04.2014].

Singh J.K.S. (2008), Whispers of Change: Female Staff Numbers in Commonwealth Universities, The Association of Commonwealth Universities, London.

Thanacoody P.R, Bartram T., Barker M., Jacobs K. (2006), Career Progression among Female Academics: Comparative Study of Australia and Mauritius, “Women in Management”, 21, 7, 536–553.

Tlaiss H. (2014), Neither-nor Career Success of Women in an Arab Middle Eastern Context, “Emerald Insight”, 37, 5, 525–546.

World Economic Forum (2014), The Global Gender Gap Report 2014, Geneva, World Economic
Forum, http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2014/ [access: 10.10.2015].

Kwartalnik ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.
Pierwotną wersją czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna publikowana w internecie.