Socialist and Post-socialist Communication Research: a Longitudinal Analysis

Zrinjka Peruško,

Dina Vozab

Abstrakt
The present paper uncovers the intellectual history and present of the communication and media studies and its thematic and paradigmatic foci based on content analysis of articles dealing with communication topics in social scientific and communication/media journals published in Croatia between 1969 and 2011. The sample includes 481 articles, constructed from all full original articles published in odd years starting in 1969, dealing with communication and media topics in the most important social scientific journals: Naše teme and Kulturni radnik (both discontinued in 1990), Politička misao, Revija za sociologiju, Društvena istraživanja, and Informatologia, and all full original articles in the academic journals devoted exclusively to media and communication studies (all of them established after 1990) – Medijska istraživanja, Medianali, and Medijske studije. The article finds a growth in volume, and diversification of topics, theories, paradigmatic approaches and methodologies in communication and media studies in Croatia, with modest improvement in scientific quality in terms of the increased use of theory and empirical research. Similarities as well as differences are identified in relation to European and US disciplinary developments in the periods of socialism and democracy.
Słowa kluczowe: history of communication research, post-socialist communication and media studies, longitudinal analysis, content analysis, Croatia
References

Alsina M.R., García Jiménez L. (2010). Communication theory and research in Spain: A paradigmatic case of a socio-humanistic discipline. European Journal of Communication, vol. 25(3), pp. 273–286.

Aparac T., Pehar F. (2010). Information Sciences in Croatia: A View from the Perspective of Bibliometric Analysis of two Leading Journals. In: B. Larsen, J.W. Schneider, F. Astrom (eds.). The Janus Faced Scholar: A Festschrift in Honour of Peter Ingwersen (pp. 325–338). Copenhagen: Royal School of Library and Information Science.

Bryant J., Mirion D. (2004). Theory and Research in Mass Communication. Journal of Communication, December, pp. 662–704.

Burrel G., Morgan G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Ashgate (reprinted 2005).

Craig R. (1989). Communication as a Practical Discipline. In: B. Darvin et al. (eds.). Rethink­ing Communication. Vol. I: Paradigm Issues (pp. 97–122). Newbury Park–London–New Delhi: Sage.

Craig R.T. (1999). Communication Theory as a Field. Communication Theory, vol. 9(2), May, pp. 119–161.

Craig R.T. (2006). A Path Through the Methodological Divides. Keio Communication Review, no. 28, pp. 9–17.

Craig R.T. (2008). Communication as a Field and Discipline. In: W. Donsbach (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Communication. Blackwell reference online.

Darvin B., Grossberg L., O’Keefe B.J., Wartella E. (eds.) (1989). Rethinking Communication. Vol. I: Paradigm Issues. Newbury Park–London–New Delhi: Sage.

Donsbach W. (2006). Presidential Address. The Identity of Communication Research. Journal of Communication, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 437–448.

Feeley T.H. (2008). A Bibliometric Analysis of Communication Journals from 2002 to 2005. Human Communication Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 505–520.

Fink E., Gantz W. (1996). A Content Analysis of Three Mass Communication Research Traditions: Social Science, Interpretative Studies, and Critical Analysis. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Spring, vol. 73(1), pp. 114–134.

Giddens A. (1989). The Orthodox Consensus and the Emerging Synthesis. In: B. Darvin et al. (eds.). Rethinking Communication. Vol. I: Paradigm Issues (pp. 53–65). Newbury Park–London–New Delhi: Sage.

Gitlin T. (1974). Media Sociology: the dominant paradigm. Theory and Society, vol. 6, pp. 205–253.

Hall S. (1989). Ideology and Communication Theory. In: B. Darvin et al. (eds.). Rethinking Communication. Vol. I: Paradigm Issues (pp. 40–52). Newbury Park–London–New Delhi: Sage.

Hesmondhalgh D., Toynbee J. (2008). The Media and Social Theory. Abingdon–Oxon: Routledge.

Jensen K.B. (2012). Introduction. The State of Convergence in Media and Communication Research. In: K.B. Jensen (ed.). A Handbook of Media and Communication Research (pp. 1–20). London–New York: Routledge.

Krippendorf K. (2004). Content Analysis. An Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Lauff E. (2005). National Diversity of Major International Journals in the Field of Communication. Journal of Communication, March, pp. 139–151.

Löblich M. (2007). German Publizistikwissenschaft and its Shift from a Humanistic to an Empirical Social Scientific Discipline: Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, Emil Dovifat and the Publizistik Debate. European Journal of Communication, vol. 22, pp. 69–88.

Löblich M., Scheu A.M. (2011). Writing the History of Communication Studies: A Sociology of Science Approach. Communication Theory, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–22.

Mataušić J.M. (2007). Komunikacijske znanosti. Definicije i područja istraživanja. In: M.J. Mataušić (ed.). Komunikacijske znanosti: Znanstvene grane i nazivlje. Hrvatski studiji Sveučilišta u Zagrebu (pp. 9–37). Zagreb.

McQuail D. (1985). Sociology of Mass Communication. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 11, pp. 93–111.

Morgan M. (1995). The Critical Contribution of George Gerbner. In: J. Lent (ed.). A Different Road Taken: Profiles in Critical Communication (pp. 99–117). Boulder, CO: Westview.

Pažanin A. (2008). Goran Batina, “Počeci sociologije u Hrvatskoj”. Kultura I društvo. Zagreb: HSD, 2006. Prikaz knjige. Politička misao, vol. 45, no. 3–4, pp. 301–305.

Pehar F. (2010). Komunikacijska uloga časopisa u polju informacijskih znanosti: bibliometrijska analiza Vjesnika bibliotekara Hrvatske i Informatologije. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zagreb [http://bib.irb.hr/prikazi-rad?lang=en&rad=465393] (summary accessed on May 15, 2013).

Peruško Z. (2011). Researching media audience in Croatia: an uncharted territory, or just under theorized? Overview of European Audience Research. Research report from the 1st Meeting of the COST Action IS0906 Transforming Audiences, Transforming Societies: proceedings. Bilandžić Helena, Carpentier Nico, Patriarche Geoffroy, Ponte Cristina, Schrøder Kim, Vossen Emilie, Zeller Frauke (ur.). Brussels: COST action ISO906, p. 33–37.

Peruško Z., Vozab D. (2013, June 16–17). Development of communication as an academic field/discipline in Croatia: Connections, disconnections. New Histories of Communication Study. International Communication Association Preconference, London.

Peruško Z., Vozab D. (2016). Communication Field in Croatia: Toward a Comparative History of Communication Studies in Central and Eastern Europe. In: P. Simonson, D.W. Park (eds.). The International History of Communication Study (pp. 213–234). New York–London: Routledge.

Pietilä V., Malmberg T., Nordenstreng K. (1990). Theoretical Convergences and Contrasts: A View from Finland. European Journal of Communication, no. 5, pp. 165–185.

Pooley J., Park D. (2008). Introduction. In: D. Park, J. Pooley (eds.). The History of Media and Communication Research: Contested Memories (pp. 1–15). New York: Peter Lang.

Potter W.J., Cooper R., Dupagne M. (1993). The Three Paradigms of Mass Media Research in Mainstream Communication Journals. Communication Theory, vol. 3, November, pp. 317–335.

Rosengren K.E. (1983). “Communication Research: One Paradigm, or Four?” Ferment in the Field. Journal of Communication, no. 3, pp. 185–207.

Rosengren K.E. (1989). Paradigms Lost and Regained. In: B. Darvin et al. (eds.). Rethinking Communication. Vol. I: Paradigm Issues. Newbury Park–London–New Delhi: Sage.

Splichal S. (1989a). Indigenization versus Ideologization: Communication Science on the Periphery. European Journal of Communication, September 1989, vol. 4(3), pp. 329–359.

Splichal S. (1989b). Razvoj znanosti na periferiji: komunikologija u Jugoslaviji. Kulturni radnik, vol. 42(4), pp. 1–39.

Štulhofer A., Baćak V., Šuljok A. (2010). Provincijalni karakter hrvatske sociologije. Revija za sociologiju, vol. 40(1), pp. 103–108.

Vartanova E. (2009). De-Sovietizing Russian media studies. In: D. Kishan Thussu (ed.). Internationalizing Media Studies (pp. 214–227). London: Routledge.

Czasopismo ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.
Pierwotną wersją czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna publikowana w internecie.