The US’s and the EU’s Generalised System of Preferences: A Comparison in the Context of Workers’ Rights

Aneta Tyc

Abstrakt

In the context of recent GSP changes, especially the Trump Administration’s steps relating to certain beneficiary countries, it is timely to assess the effectiveness of this unilateral mechanism. In particular, the academic question connected to the impact of the GSP on social development and human rights in the beneficiary countries is the key issue. It is also interesting to what extent the threat of blocking imports or the withdrawal from the scheme can give rise to policy change regarding labour standards. This article aims to analyse the legal basis, and compare the EU’s and the US’s GSP labour provisions. The author applies critical reasoning and comparative analysis with a view to showing the differences between both countries. She focuses her attention on advantages and disadvantages of the GSP schemes—not only those currently in effect in the US and the EU, but also from a historical perspective. 

ASJC: 3308, JEL: K31

* The project was financed by the National Science Centre in Poland pursuant to the decision number DEC-2016/21/D/HS5/03849. The project’s registration number is: 2016/21/D/HS5/03849.

Słowa kluczowe: labour standards, workers’ rights, scheme of generalised tariff preferences, international trade / standardy pracy, prawa pracownicze, ogólny system preferencji taryfowych, handel międzynarodowy
References

Alston P. (1996) Labor Rights Provisions in U.S. Trade Law: “Aggressive Unilateralism”? [in:] L. A. Compa, S. F. Diamond (eds.), Human Rights, Labor Rights, and International Trade, Philadelphia.

Beke L., Hachez N. (2015) The EU GSP: A Preference for Human Rights and Good Governance? The Case of Myanmar [in:] J. Wouters, A. Marx, D. Geraets, B. Natens (eds.), Global Governance through Trade: EU Policies and Approaches, Cheltenham–Northampton.

Bronstein A. (2009) International and Comparative Labour Law. Current challenges, Geneva.

Church Albertson P., Compa L. (2015) Labour Rights and Trade Agreements in the Americas [in:] A. Blackett, A. Trebilcock (eds.), Research Handbook on Transnational Labour Law, Cheltenham–Northampton.

Douglas W. A., Ferguson J. P., Klett E. (2004) An Effective Confluence of Forces in Support of Workers’ Rights: ILO Standards, US Trade Laws, Unions, and NGOs, “Human Rights Quarterly,” Vol. 26, Issue 2.

Gassebner M., Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan A. (2018) Politicized Trade: What Drives Withdrawal of Trade P?, “Economics Letters,” Vol. 167, Issue C.

Hyde A. (2006) A Game-Theory Account and Defence of Transnational Labour Standards: A Preliminary Look at the Problem [in:] J. D. R. Craig, S. M. Lynk (eds.), Globalization and the Future of Labour Law, Cambridge et al.

Mosley L., Tello L. (2015) Labor Rights, Material Interests, and Moral Entrepreneurship, “Human Rights Quarterly,” Vol. 37.

Myant M. (2017) The Impact of Trade and Investment Agreements on Decent Work and Sustainable Development, European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), Brussels.

Novitz T. (2018) Labour Standards and Trade: Need We Choose between “Human Rights” and “Sustainable Development”? [in:] H. Gott (ed.), Labour Standards in International Economic Law, Springer.

Ojeda-Aviles A. (2015) Transnational Labour Law, Alphen aan den Rijn.

Peel J. (1979) The Real Power Game: A Guide to European Industrial Relations, Maidenhead.

Portela C., Orbie J. (2014) Sanctions under the EU Generalised System of P and foreign policy: coherence by accident?, “Contemporary Politics,” Vol. 20, Issue 1.

Razavi S. M. H. (2010) Labour Standards and WTO. Dilemma of Legitimacy and Efficacy, “The Journal of World Investment & Trade,” Vol. 11, Issue 5.

Ringel B. (2019) President Trump Suspends Preferential Trade Treatment for Thailand, 28 October, https://www.ustrademonitor.com/2019/10/president-trump-suspends-preferential-trade-treatment-for-thailand/ (access: 20 December 2019).

The International Corporate Accountability Roundtable (2018) Tools of Trade. The Use of U.S. Generalized System of P to Promote Labor Rights for All, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/583f3fca725e25fcd45aa446/t/5a723ff1ec212d3d586635d9/

1517436916673/ICAR+GSP+Report+FINAL.pdf (access: 9 January 2020).

Tsogas G. (2000) Labour Standards in the Generalized Systems of P of the European Union and the United States, “European Journal of Industrial Relations,” Vol. 6, No. 3.

Velluti S. (2015) The EU’s Social Dimension and Its External Trade Relations [in:] A. Marx, J. Wouters, G. Rayp, L. Beke (eds.), Global Governance of Labour Rights. Assessing the Effectiveness of Transnational Public and Private Policy Initiatives, Cheltenham–Northampton.

Weiss M. (2018) The EU Generalised Scheme of P and the Special Incentive Arrangement for Sustainable Development and Good Governance [in:] A. Perulli, T. Treu (eds.), Sustainable Development, Global Trade and Social Rights, Alphen aan den Rijn.

Yap J. (2015) One Step Forward: The European Union Generalised System of P and Labour Rights in the Garment Industry in Bangladesh [in:] J. Wouters, A. Marx, D. Geraets, B. Natens (eds.), Global Governance through Trade: EU Policies and Approaches, Cheltenham–Northampton.

Zhou W., Cuyvers L. (2011) Linking International Trade and Labour Standards: The Effectiveness of Sanctions under the European Union’s GSP, “Journal of World Trade,” Vol. 45, No. 1.

Pierwotną wersją czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna publikowana w internecie.

Czasopismo zostało dofinansowane ze środków Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego na podstawie umowy nr 284/WCN/2019/1 z dnia 16 lipca 2019 r. z pomocy przyznanej w ramach programu „Wsparcie dla czasopism naukowych.