Bizarre Bio-Citizens and the Future of Medicine. The Works of Alexandra Daisy Ginsberg and Agi Haines in the context of Speculative Design and Bioethics

Joanna Jeśman

Abstrakt

The article concerns speculative design in the context of bioethics. The author analyzes and interprets projects by designer Alexandra Daisy Ginsberg and Age Haines in relation to modern biotechnologies, future scenarios of medicine and machine ethics.

Słowa kluczowe: speculative design, bioethics, bio art, biotechnology
References

Anderson M., Anderson S.L., Machine Ethics: Creating and Ethical Intelligent Agent, “AI Magazine” 2007, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 15–26.

Anderson M., Anderson S.L., Armen C., Towards Machine Ethics, Conference AAAI-04 Workshop on Agent Organizations, Theory and Practice, July 2004.

Bryant L., Srnicek N., Harman G. (eds.), The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism, Re-Press, Melbourne 2011.

Dunne A., Raby F., Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming, The MIT Press, Cambridge–London 2013.

Gunkel D., The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives in AI, Robots and Ethics, The MIT Press, Cambridge–London 2012.

Haushofer J., CV of Failures, https://www.princeton.edu/~joha/Johannes_Haushofer_CV_of_Failures.pdf (accessed: 11.11.2019).

Kaiser J., Normile D., Embryo Engineering Study Splits the Scientific Community, “Science” 2015, vol. 348 (May), pp. 486–487.

Knott G., Doudna J., CRISPR-Cas Guides the Future of Genetic Engineering, “Science” 2018, vol. 361 (August), pp. 866–869.

Kurzweil R., The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, Duckworth, London 2013.

Malpass M., Critical Design in Context: History, Theory, and Practice, Bloomsbury, London–New York 2019.

Moor J.H. The Nature, Importance, and Difficulty of Machine Ethics, “IEEE Intelligent Systems” 2006, July–August, pp. 18–21.

Picard R., Affective Computing, M.I.T Media Lab Perceptual Computing Technical Report, https://affect.media.mit.edu/pdfs/95.picard.pdf (accessed: 11.11.2019).

Report Emerging Biotechnologies: Technology, Choice and the Public Good, http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/emerging-biotechnologies (accessed: 12.11.2019).

National Academies, Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance, Report Highlights, http://nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/genesite/documents/webpage/gene_177260.pdf (accessed: 12.11.2019).

Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M., Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in the Age of Uncertainty, Polity Press, Cambridge 2001.

Ritschel Ch., Independent, https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/dissertation-phd-doctor-rejection-letter-skirt-caitlin-kirby-a9166866.html (accessed: 11.11.2019).

Rose N., The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century, Princeton University Press, Princeton–Oxford 2007.

Stefan M., A CV of Failures, “Nature” 2010, vol. 468 (November), p. 467.

Tharp B., Tharp S., Discursive Design: Critical, Speculative and Alternative Things, The MIT Press, Cambridge–London 2018.

Williams R., Compressed Foresight and Narrative Bias: Pitfalls in Assessing High Technology Futures, “Science and Culture” 2006, no. 15(4), pp. 265–289.

Żylińska J., Bioethics in the Age of New Media, The MIT Press, Cambridge–London 2009.

Pierwotną wersją czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna publikowana
kwartalnie w internecie. Czasopismo ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.