Urban resilience czy krytyczne teorie zmiany? Spór wokół studiów miejskich na marginesie kryzysu pandemii

Agata Skórzyńska

Abstrakt

Urban Resilience or Critical Theories of Change? Disputes on Urban Studies in the Context of Pandemic Crisis

The aim of the article is critical reconstruction of a current dispute in the field of urban studies. Recent dabates and polemics between researchers related to such approaches, as planetary urbanisation thesis, urban political ecology, assemblage urbanism, urban postcolonial studies and – last but not least – well known Los Angeles School – showed that the expieriencie of the urban cirisises is closely related to the search for the new knowledge and concepts, that can bring visons of change and sollutions. At stake is, however, the recognition that some theoretical proposals have the potential to develop critical knowledge, while others tend to become just new urban ideologies, attractive, but often reactive, ineffective or exclusive. The climate change, as well as recent pandemic crisis shows clearly that well-established theoretical criticism is just as nessecary as cultural activity or political action, if urban studies are to continue to provide us with knowledge that responds to the challenges of the future. Theoretical disputes are sometimes just a „family war”, but they often show the most sensitive problems to which scientific knowledge must answer. Urban crisises in turn, as COVID-19 pandemic clearly shows – are often unexpected pracitical tests of theories.

Słowa kluczowe: critical urban studies, planetary urbanization, assemblage urbanism, postcolonial urban studies, urban political ecology, crisic, pandemic
References

Amin A., Thrift N., Cities: Reimagining the Urban, Polity Press, Cambridge–Oxford–Malden 2002.

Angelo H., Wachsmuth D., Urbanizing Urban Political Ecology: A Critique of Methodological Cityism, „International Journal of Urban and Regional Research” 2014, vol. 39 (1), s. 16–27.

Bennett J., Oral History and Delinquency: The Rethoric of Criminology, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago–London 1980.

Brenner N., Debating Planetary Urbanization: For an Engaged Pluralism, „Environment and Planning D: Society and Space” 2018, vol. 36 (3), s. 2–3.

Brenner N., Madden D.J., Wachsmuth D., Assemblage, Actor-Networks and the Challenges of Critical Urban Theory, w: N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, M. Mayer (eds.), Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City, Routledge, London 2012, s. 117–137.

Brenner N., Schmidt Ch., Elements for a New Epistemology of the Urban, w: S. Hall, R. Burdett (eds.), The Sage Handbook of the 21st City, Sage Publications, London 2017, s. 47–67.

Brenner N., Schmidt Ch., Towards a New Epistemology of the Urban?, „City” 2015, vol. 19 (2–3), s. 151–182.

Brenner N., What Is Critical Urban Theory?, „City” 2009, vol. 13 (2), s. 198–207.

Farias I., Bender T. (eds.), Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network-Theory Changes Urban Theory, Routledge, London–New York 2011.

Graham S., Marvin S., Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and Urban Condition, Routledge, London–New York 2001.

Lefebvre H., The Urban Revolution, przeł. R. Bononno, The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 2003.

Matysek-Imielińska M., Jakich badań potrzebuje kulturoznawstwo? Metodologiczne ćwiczenia, „Prace Kulturoznawcze” 2019, nr 23 (4), s. 151–156.

McFarlane C., Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden–Oxford–Chichester 2011.

Musa G.U., COVID-19: The Global Pandemic and Cities’ Resilience, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/covid-19-global-pandemic-cities-resilience-godswill-unekwuojo-musa (dostęp: 8.07.2020).

Nowak A.W., Wyobraźnia ontologiczna. Filozoficzna (re)konstrukcja fronetycznych nauk społecznych, Instytut Badań Literackich PAN / Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań–Warszawa 2016.

Pandemic Urbanism: Praxis in the Time of COVID-19, opracowanie zespołowe, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EK9MSBySLHLk9aqADj2k3i5Z7RD-fKpLdAVplKBFw8w/mobilebasic (dostęp: 8.07.2020).

Ramos G., Hynes W., A Systemic Resilience Approach to Dealing with COVID-19 and Future Shocks, http://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/a-systemic-resilience-approachto-dealing-with-covid-19-and-future-shocks-36a5bdfb/ (dostęp: 8.07.2020).

Reckwitz A., Towards a Theory of Social Practices: A Development of Culturalists Theorizing, „European Journal of Social Theory” 2002, nr 5 (2).

Robinson J., Global and World Cities: A View from off the Map, „International Journal of Urban and Regional Research” 2002, vol. 26 (3), s. 531–54.

Roy A., The 21st-century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory, „Regional Studies” 2009, vol. 43 (6), s. 819–30.

Schatzki T.R., The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA 2002.

Skórzyńska A., Praxis i miasto. Ćwiczenie z kulturowych badań angażujących, Instytut Badań Literackich PAN, Warzawa 2017.

Skórzyńska A., W poszukiwaniu miasta jako praxis, w: E. Rewers (red.), Kulturowe studia miejskie. Wprowadzenie, Narodowe Centrum Kultury, Warszawa 2014, s. 338–342.

Storper M., Scott A.J., Current Debates in Urban Theory: A Critical Assessment, „Urban Studies” 2016, vol. 53 (6), s. 1114–1136.

Swyngedouw E., Heynen N., Urban Political Ecology, Justice and the Politics of Scale, „Antipode” 2003, vol. 35 (5), s. 898–918.

Swyngedouw E., Metabolic Urbanization: The Making of Cyborg Cities, w: N. Heynen, M. Kaika, E. Swyngedouw (eds.), In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, Routledge, New York–London 2006.

UN-Habitat COVID-19 Response Plan, https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/04/final_un-habitat_covid-19_response_plan.pdf.