Can a Park Save the City?: Hopes and Pitfalls of the London National Park City

Konrad Miciukiewicz

Abstrakt

This article enquires into the transformative potential of the London National Park City. In doing so it situates the vision for, the becoming, and the Charter of an urban national park in relational thinking about metropolitan nature and sustainable urbanisation. It looks at hopes and pitfalls of the London National Park City in the face of growing socio-environmental injustice and the climate crisis. First, the article explores the National Park City as a form of ecological reflexivity and social practice in the context of relational concepts of nature and the city. Second, it examines opportunities offered by the Park City with respect to urban environmental sustainability, health and wellbeing, connected diversity, socio-economic inclusion and political agency. Third, it looks at pitfalls of the National Park City relating to environmental gentrification, as well as to trade-offs between grassroots creativity and capability to bring about material change. Last but not least, the article advocates for negotiation of synergies between ‘green’ and ‘grey’ urban natures as a strategy to address the climate crisis.

Słowa kluczowe: city, nature, London, National Park, relational geography, sustainable urbanisation, socio-environmental justice
References

Amin A. (2002). Ethnicity and the multicultural city: living with diversity. Environment and Planning A, 34(6): 959–980.

Andersson J., Delica K., Frandsen M. (2013). From ‘book container’ to community centre. In: F. Moularet, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, A. Hamdouch (eds.). The International Handbook of Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Askins K., Pain R. (2011). Contact zones: participation, materiality, and the messiness of interaction. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29: 803–821.

Bell J.F., Wilson J.S., Liu G.U (2008). Neighbourhood greenness and 2-year changes in body mass index of children and youth. American Journal Preventative Medicine, 35(6): 547–53.

Bohn K., Viljoen A. (2005). New space for old space: An urban vision. In: A. Viljoen, K. Bohn, J. Howe (eds.). Continuous Productive Urban Landscapes: Designing Urban Agriculture for Sustainable Cities (pp. 3–9). Oxford and Burlington, MA: Elsevier Architectural Press.

Byrne J. (2012). When green is White: The cultural politics of race, nature and social exclusion in a Los Angeles urban national park. Geoforum, 43(3): 595–611.

Checker M. (2011). Wiped out by the Greenwave: Environmental gentrification and the paradoxical politics of urban sustainability. City and Society, 23: 210–229.

Cook I., Swyngedouw E. (2012). Cities, social cohesion and the environment: Towards a future research agenda. Urban Studies, 49(9): 1959–1979.

Coombes E., Jones P.J., Hillsdon M. (2010). The relationship of physical activity and over-weight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Social Science & Medicine, 70(6): 816–22.

Dean H. (2009). Critiquing capabilities: the distractions of a beguiling concept. Critical Social Policy, 29(2): 261–273.

Dooling S. (2009). Ecological gentrification: A research agenda exploring justice in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33: 621–639.

Dukes T., Musterd S. (2012). Towards social cohesion: Bridging national integration rhetoric and local practice: The case of the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 49(9): 1981–1997.

Fraser N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ Age. New Left Review, 1(212): 68–93.

Gandy M. (2003). Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.

Garcia M., Pradel M., Eizaguirre S. (2009). ‘Social Innovation and Governance: initiatives and processes’ paper presented at ‘Changing Cultures of Competitiveness’ ESRC Seminar Series (Theme 6: Social Exclusion and Socially Creative Spaces), Newcastle, 13th July 2009.

Heynen N., Perkins H.A. (2005). Scalar dialectics in green: Urban private property and the contradictions of the neoliberalization of nature. Capitalism. Nature. Socialism, 16: 99–113.

Hillier J. (2003). Agon’izing over consensus: why Habermasian ideals a cannot be ‘real’. Planning Theory, 2(1): 37–59.

Kaźmierczak A. (2013). The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1): 31–44.

Latour B. (1994). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lee A., Maheswaran R. (2010). The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. International Journal of Public Health, 33(2): 212–222.

Lovell R., Husk K., Bethel A., Garside R. (2014). What are the health and well-being impacts of community gardening for adults and children: a mixed method systematic review protocol. Environmental Evidence, 3(20): 1–13.

Low S., Taplin D., Scheld S. (2005). Rethinking Urban Parks: Public Space and Cultural Diversity. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Marcuse P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory Policy, Action, 13 (2–3): 185–196.

Mayor of London (2015). London Infrastructure Plan 2050 Update. London: Mayor of London.

Miciukiewicz K., Moulaert F., Novy A., Musterd S., Hillier J. (2012). Problematising cities and social cohesion: a transdisciplinary endeavour. Urban Studies, 49(9): 1855–1872.

Mouffe Ch. (2000a). The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.

Mouffe Ch. (2000b). Deliberative Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism. Political Science Series 72. Vienna Institute for Advanced Studies.

Nussbaum M. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Raven-Ellison D. (2015). Greater London National Park City Green Paper. Available at: http://www.greaterlondonnationalpark.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Greater-London-National-Park-City-Green-Paper-Final.pdf

Rigolon A., Nemeth J. (2020). Green gentrification or ‘just green enough’: Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not? Urban Studies, 57(2): 402–420.

Sadler J., Bates A., Hale J., James P. (2010). Bringing cities alive: the importance of urban green spaces for people and biodiversity. In: K.J. Gaston (ed.). Urban Ecology (pp. 230–260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schlosberg D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shove E. (2014). Putting practice into policy: Reconfiguring questions of consumption and climate change. Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 9(4): 415–429.

Shove E., Walker G. (2014). What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand. Theory, Culture and Society, 31(5): 41–58.

Swyngedouw E. (1996). The city as a hybrid: On nature, society and cyborg urbanisation. Capitalism. Nature. Socialism, 7(1): 65–80.

Swyngedouw E. (2006). Metabolic urbanization: The making of cyborg cities. In: N. Heynen, M. Kaika, E. Swyngedouw (eds.). In the Nature of Cities. London and New York: Routledge.

Swyngedouw E., Moulaert F. (2010). Socially innovative projects, governance dynamics and urban change. In: S. Gonzalez, F. Martinelli, F. Moulaert, E. Swyngedouw (2010). Can Neighbourhoods Save the City? Community Development and Social Innovation. London: Routledge.

Takano T., Nakamura K., Watanabe M. (2002). Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(12): 913–918.

Tornaghi C. (2014). Critical geography of urban agriculture. Progress in Human Geography, 38(4): 551–567.

Valentine G. (2008). Living with difference: reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3): 323–337.

Van den Broeck P., Abdelwahab M., Miciukiewicz K., Hillier J. (2013). On analysing space from a strategic-relational institutionalist perspective: The Cultural Park for Children in Cairo. International Planning Studies, 18(3–4): 321–341.

Wachsmuth D., Angelo H. (2018). Green and gray: New ideologies of nature in urban sustainability policy. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(4): 1038–1056.

White M.P., Alcock I., Wheeler B.W., Depledge M.H. (2013). Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychological Science, 24(6): 920–928.

Wolch J. (2007). Green urban worlds. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(2): 373–384.

Woch J.R., Byrne J., Newell J.P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125: 234–244.