Artywistyczne praktyki mapowania przeciw kryzysom. W stronę miejskiej potencjalności

Joanna Pankau

Abstrakt

Artivistic Mapping Practices Against Crises. Towards Urban Potential

The article focuses on the artistic-activist practicies of mapping urban crises, asking about their critical and transformational potential. Artivistic mapping – combining artistic practices with a form of political activism – is recognized in context of extracting inequalities in monitoring crisis areas, as well as the city’s transformational capabilities. Looking at the involvement of artists and activists in mapping projects is combined with the question of the potential for anti-crisis action – shaping political perceptions and stimulating alternative practical responses to generated urban problems. The following issues are addressed: (1) counter-mapping and the relationship of artistic practices with critical cartography, (2) the development of activist mapping forms – maptivism and crisis mapping, and (3) references to the interests of new urban ontologies, in particular the on-epistemological dimension of urban mapping assemblage, binding issues of updating and the potential of cities.

Mapping is recognized in the critical-activating dimension as a form of cognition oriented on creative experimentation and interference in existing reality. Because of this, it is an interesting and prolific area for practical consideration of the form of ‘engagement policy’ through ‘research of potentiality’. It is worth considering in what sense the practices of artistic and activist crisis mapping can be a “turning point” – opening “a window to new ways of seeing and imagining” (K. Dovey, M. Ristic). It is primarily a field for asking questions about transformational mapping possibilities – perceiving the city as a place of “radical potentiality” (C. McFarlane). In order to illustrate the problem more clearly, the last part of the work analyzes the anti-gentrification activities in the San Francisco Bay Area, in particular the mapping practices undertaken by Anti-Eviction Mapping Project.

Słowa kluczowe: artivistic practicies of mapping, critical cartography, crisis mapping, maptivism, urban assemblages
References

Amin A., The Good City, „Urban Studies” 2006, vol. 43 (5/6), s. 1009–1023.

Anderson B., Affect, w: M. Jayne, K. Ward (eds.), Urban Theory: New Critical Perspectives, Routledge, London–New York 2017, s. 19–29.

Cartwright W., Art and Cartographic Communication, w: W. Cartwright, G. Gartner, A. Lehn (eds.), Cartography and Art, Springer, Berlin 2009, s. 9–22.

Cosgrove D., Mappings, Reaktion, London–New York 1999.

Cosgrove D., Maps, Mapping, Modernity: Art and Cartography in the Twentieth Century, „Imago Mundi” 2005, vol. 57 (1), s. 35–54.

Crampton J.W., Krygier J., An Introduction to Critical Cartography, „An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies” 2006, vol. 4 (1), s. 11–13.

Criado T.S., Rodríguez-Giralt I., Can ANT Be Form of Activism?, w: A. Blok, I. Farías, C. Roberts (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory, Routledge, London–New York 2020, s. 360–368.

D’Ignazio C., Art and Cartography, w: R. Kitchin, N. Thrift (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. 1st Edition, Elsevier Press, Oxford 2009, s. 190–206.

D’Ignazio C., Art-Machines, Body-Ovens and Map-Recipes: Entries for a Psychogeographic Dictionary, „Cartographic Perspectives” 2006, no. 53, s. 24–40.

Debord G., Towards a Situationist International, w: C. Bishop (ed.), Participation, The MIT Press, Whitechapel, London–Cambridge 2006, s. 96–101.

Dewsbury J.D., The Deleuze-Guattarian Assemblage: Plastic Habits, „Area” 2011, vol. 43 (2), s. 148–153.

Dovey K., Ristic M., Mapping Urban Assemblages: The Production of Spatial Knowledge, „Journal of Urbanism” 2015, vol. 10 (1), s. 1–14.

Farías I., The Politics of Urban Assemblages, „City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action” 2011, vol. 15 (3–4), s. 365–374.

Maharawal M.M., McElroy E., The Anti-Eviction Mapping Project: Counter Mapping and Oral History toward Bay Area Housing Justice, „Annals of the American Association of Geographers” 2017, vol. 108 (2), s. 1–10.

McElroy E., Werth A., Deracinated Dispossessions: On the Foreclosures of ‘Gentrification’ in Oakland, CA, „Antipode” 2019, vol. 51 (3), s. 878–898.

McFarlane C., Assemblage and Critical Urbanism, „City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action” 2011, vol. 15 (2), s. 204–224.

Nacher A., Media lokacyjne. Ukryte życie obrazów, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2016.

Nacher A., Teletechnologie, linie i cyfrowe ślady: od sytuacjonizmu i land artu do sztuki mediów lokacyjnych, „Sztuka i Dokumentacja” 2014, nr 11, s. 71–78.

Opillard F., Resisting the Politics of Displacement in the San Francisco Bay Area: Anti-gentrification Activism in the Tech Boom 2.0, „European Journal of American Studies” 2015, vol. 10 (3), s. 1–23.

Wood D., Map Art, „Cartographic Perspectives” 2006, no. 53, s. 5–14.

Wood D., Rethinking the Power of Maps, Guilford, New York 2010.

Źródła internetowe:

Fliervoet D., Grassroots Maptivism: Mapping Feminist Movements around the World, „Master of Media” 2018, https://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/blog/2018/10/23/52155/.

Meier P., wywiad przeprowadzony przez N. Scola, Digital Mappers Plot the Future of Maptivism, 2011, http://techpresident.com/blog-entry/digital-mappers-plot-future-maptivism-0.

Burlison D., ‘Take This Hammer’ Reveals Power of Art and Activism at YBCA, https://www.kqed.org/arts/11422332/take-this-hammer-reveals-power-of-art-and-activism-at-ybca.

https://www.ushahidi.com/about

Anti-Eviction Mapping Project, Tech Bus Stop and Eviction, 2011–2013, http://www.antievictionmappingproject.net/techbusevictions.html.

Gentrification & Eviction Technologies OUT: G.E.T. OUT, https://www.heart-of-the-city.org/get-out--sf-pride.html.

Pierwotną wersją czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna publikowana
kwartalnie w internecie. Czasopismo ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.