3rd Person Needs Licensing Too: Examining the se/suu Connection

Gurmeet Kaur,

Louise Raynaud

Abstrakt

This paper introduces two instances of person effects with 3rd person items – the reflexive clitic se in French and the non-honorific clitic pronoun suu in Punjabi. Examining the properties of these items, we argue against the phi-feature based accounts of person licensing. Instead, we re-conceptualize it as a syntactico-semantic phenomenon, which requires a pronominal to be contextually-anchored via a feature labeled [F]. More globally, this paper attempts to work out the special status of person and articulate why person requires special licensing in grammar.

Słowa kluczowe: licensing, person, reflexives, anchoring, agreement
References

 Adger David, Harbour Daniel (2007). Syntax and syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint. Syntax 10(1), 2–37.

Adger David, Ramchand Gillian (2005). Merge and Move: Wh-dependencies revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2), 161–193.

Ahn Byron (2015). Giving reflexivity a voice: Twin reflexives in English. Los Angeles, CA: University of California. PhD dissertation.

Akhtar Raja (1997). Affix -s(uu) constructions in Punjabi. Essex Graduate Working Papers in Linguistics, 1–18.

Alexiadou Artemis, Anagnostopoulou Elena (2006). From hierarchies to features. In Agreement Systems, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Anagnostopoulou Elena (2003). The Syntax of Ditransitives. Evidence from Clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Anagnostopoulou Elena (2005). Strong and weak person restrictions: A feature checking analysis. In Clitic and Affix Combinations, Lorie Heggie and Francisco Ordóñez (eds.), 199–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Arregi Karlos, Hanink Emily (2018). Switch reference in Washo as multiple subject agreement. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 48, Sherry Hucklebridge and Max Nelson (eds.), 1–10. Amherst: GLSA Publications.

Baker Mark (2008). The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Béjar Susana, Rezac Milan (2003). Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects. In Romance Linguistics: Theory and Acquisition, Ana Teresa Perez Leroux, and Yves Roberge (eds.), 49–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Béjar Susana, Rezac Milan (2009). Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40(1), 35–73.

Benveniste Emile (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.

Bhatia Tej. K. (1993). Punjabi: A Cognitive-Descriptive Grammar. London: Routledge.

Bhatt Rajesh (2007). Ergativity in the Modern Indo-Aryan Languages. Handout: Ergativity Seminar, MIT.

Bianchi Valentina (2006). On the syntax of personal arguments. Lingua 116, 2023–2067.

Biberauer Theresa (2018). Extended Peripheries: A New Comparative Perspective on Afrikaans. Handout presented at CGSW33, Göttingen (28.09.2018).

Bonet Eulàlia (1991). Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance languages. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. PhD dissertation.

Butt Miriam (2007). The role of pronominal suffixes in Punjabi. In Architectures, Rules and Preferences: A Festschrift for Joan Bresnan, Annie Zaenen, Jane Simpson, Tracy Holloway King, Jane Grimshaw, Joan Maling, and Chris Manning (eds.), 341–368. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Chandra  Pritha,  Kaur  Gurmeet  (2017).  Differential subject  marking  and  Person Licensing Condition. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 43(1), 25–46.

Chomsky Noam (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honour of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), 89–115. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky Noam (2001). Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Coon Jessica, Preminger Omer (2012). Towards a unified account of person splits. In Proceedings of the 29th  West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Jaehoon Choi et al. (eds.), 310–318. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Delfitto Denis, Fiorin Gaetano (2011). Person features and pronominal anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 42(2), 193–224.

Deo Ashwini, Sharma Devyani (2006). Typological variation in the ergative morphology of Indo-Aryan languages. Linguistic Typology 10(3), 369–418.

Grosz Patrick (2015). Movement and agreement in right‐node‐raising constructions. Syntax 18(1), 1–38.

Gruber Bettina (2013). The spatiotemporal dimensions of person: A morphosyntactic account of indexical pronouns. Utrecht: Utrecht University. PhD dissertation.

Harley Heidi, Ritter Elizabeth (2002). Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3), 482–526.

Haspelmath Martin (2004). Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint: A usage-based approach. Constructions 2.

Hicks Glyn (2009). The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Kalin Laura (2017). Nominal licensing is driven by valued (phi-)features, Nordlyd 43(1), 1–14.

Kalin Laura (2018). Licensing and differential object marking: The view from Neo-Aramaic. Syntax 21(2), 112–159.

Kaur Gurmeet (2016). Person in Punjabi: Investigating argument and clitic licensing. Delhi: Indian Institute of Technology Delhi. PhD dissertation.

Kaur Gurmeet (2017). Variation in subject-triggered clitic restrictions: A case of Punjabi. In Proceedings of Glow in Asia XI (Vol. 1), Michael Y. Erlewine (ed.), 111–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

Kayne Richard (1975). French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kim-Renaud Young-Key, Pak Miok (2006). Agreement in Korean syntax: A case of sentence final particles. In Harvard International Symposium on Korean Linguistics XI, Susumo Kuno et al. (eds.), 548–561. Seoul: Hanshin.

Kratzer Angelika (2009). Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40(2), 187–237.

Labelle Marie (2008). The French reflexive and reciprocal se. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26(4), 833–876.

Laenzlinger Christopher (1993). A syntactic view of French pronominal sequences. Probus 5, 245–270.

Martin Txuss, Hinzen Wolfram (2014). The grammar of the essential indexical. Lingua 148, 95-117.

Miyagawa Shigeru (2012). Agreements that occur mainly in main clauses. In Main Clause Phenomena, Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman, and Rachel Nye (eds.), 79–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Miyagawa Shigeru (2017). Agreement Beyond Phi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nevins Andrew (2007). The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(2), 273–313.

Ormazabal Javier, Romero Juan (2007). The Object Agreement Constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 315–347.

Pancheva Roumyana, Zubizarreta Maria Luisa (2017). The Person Case Constraint: The syntactic encoding of perspective. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36(1), 1–47.

Portner Paul, Pak Miok, Zanuttini Raffaella (2019). The speaker-addressee relation at the syntax-semantics interface. Language 95(1), 1–36.

Preminger Omer (2011). Asymmetries between person and number in syntax: A commentary on Bakers SCOPA. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(4), 917–937.

Preminger Omer (2019). What the PCC tells us about abstract agreement, head movement and locality. Glossa 4(1), 13, 1–42.

Raynaud Louise (2018a). Reflexives and participants: a natural class. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XXVI, Astrid van Alem, Anastasiaa Ionova, and Cora Pots (eds.), 367–391. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics.

Raynaud Louise (2018b). Romance reflexives, past participle agreement and the PCC. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Sherry Hucklebridge and Max Nelson (eds.), 1–14. Amherst: GSLA Publications.

Raynaud Louise (in prep.). Licensing anaphors and participants. Göttingen: Universität Göttingen. PhD dissertation.

Reinhart Tanya, Siloni Tal (2004). Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Martin Everaert, Artemis Alexiadou, and Elena Anagnostopoulou (eds.), 159–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reuland Eric (2011). Anaphora and Language Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rezac Milan (2004). Elements of cyclic syntax: Agree and Merge. Toronto: University of Toronto. PhD dissertation.

Rezac Milan (2008). The syntax of eccentric agreement: The Person Case Constraint and absolutive displacement in Basque. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26, 61–106.

Rezac Milan (2011). Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of Language. Dordrecht: Springer.

Ritter Elizabeth (1995). On the syntactic category of pronouns and agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13(3), 405–443.

Ritter Elizabeth, Wiltschko Martina (2014). The composition of INFL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(4), 1331–1386.

Rizzi Luigi (1990). Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rooryck Johann, van den Wyngaerd Guido (2011). Dissolving Binding Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sigurðsson Halldór (2004). The syntax of person, tense, and speech features. Rivista di Linguistica – Italian Journal of Linguistics 16(1), 219–251.

Sigurðsson Halldór (2014a). About pronouns. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 92, 66–98.

Sigurðsson Halldór (2014b). Context-linked grammar. Language Sciences 46, 175–188.

Silverstein Michael (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Richard Dixon (ed.), 112–171. New Jersey: Humanities Press.

Speas Peggy, Tenny Carol (2003). Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Sportiche Dominique (1998). Partitions and Atoms of Clause Structure. London: Rout- ledge.

Stegovec Adrian (2019). Taking case out of the Person-Case Constraint. Natural Lan- guage and Linguistic Theory, 1–51.

Sundaresan Sandhya (2012). Context and (co) reference in the syntax and its interfaces. Tromso: University of Tromso. PhD dissertation.

Sundaresan Sandhya (to appear). Distinct featural classes of anaphor in an enriched person system. In Agree to Agree: Agreement in the Minimalist Program, Peter Smith, Katharina Hartmann, and Johannes Mursell (eds.). Language Science Press.

Wechsler Stephen, Zlatic Larisa (2003). The Many Faces of Agreement. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Wurmbrand Susi (2012). The syntax of valuation in auxiliary-participle constructions. In Coyote Working Papers: Proceedings of the 29th  West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Jaehoon Choi et al. (eds.). Tuscon: University of Arizona.

Zeijlstra Hedde (2012). There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review 29, 491–539.