Realism – The Politics of Austerity

Piotr Kimla

Abstrakt

The article aims to show political realism not in the deformed framework in which his opponents – political romantics – present it, but as a universal typological category. Pietism in relation to reality forces the realists to postulate a sparse, non-military policy focused on cooperation. At the same time, it demands from its representatives that they avoid involvement beyond their own strengths and seek peaceful coexistence with their opponents in political struggles. The considerations also show the reasons why it is unlawful to bind the imperialism of Napoleon, Hitler and Stalin with political realism.

Słowa kluczowe: Political Realism and Its Characteristics, Christian Ethics vs Realistic Ethics, Napoleon’s and Hitler’s Imperialism, Realism and Its Misreadings, Alliances Between States, Strength of States, War, Realism as Moderation
References

Clausewitz C. von, On War, trans. by J.J. Graham, London 1873.

Kennedy P., The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000, New York 1989.

Liddell Hart B.H., The Other Side of the Hill, London 1951.

Machiavelli N., Discourses on Livy. Trans. Harvey C. Mansfield & Nathan Tarcov, Chicago 1998.

Mann G., The History of Germany Since 1789, trans. M. Jackson, London 1984.

Mearsheimer J.J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York 2001.

Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws, Cambridge 1989.

Pocock J.G.A., The Machiavellian Moment – Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition, Princeton 1975.

Seeckt H. von, The Future of the German Empire, New York 1930.

Walicki A., Marxism and the Leap to the Kingdom of Freedom. The Rise and Fall of the Communist Utopia, Stanford 1995.