GRAMMATICALIZATION PATHS AND CHAOS: DETERMINISM AND UNPREDICTABILITY OF THE SEMANTIC DEVELOPMENT OF VERBAL CONSTRUCTIONS (PART 1 – CHAOS IN MATHEMATICS)

Alexander Andrason

Abstrakt

This paper demonstrates that by applying Chaos Theory to the modeling of the evolution of verbal forms and verbal systems, it is possible to view classical grammaticalization paths as universal, and conceal this deterministic assumption with the unpredictability of concrete grammatical developments. The author argues that such an explanation is possible because traditional grammaticalization paths do not represent realistic cases of grammatical evolutions, but rather correspond to abstract and non-realistic deterministic laws which codify the order of the incorporation of new meanings to the semantic potential of a gram. Therefore, from a synchronic perspective, they can be used to represent the semantic potential of a form as a map or a state. In contrast, a realistic development emerges as a trajectory connecting such maps or states. Consequently, the cross-linguistic typological model of realistic evolutionary processes of a certain type corresponds to a state-space – it is a cluster of all possible trajectories the grams of a certain class can travel. In this article – the first of the series of three papers – the main tenants of Chaos Theory will be discussed.

Słowa kluczowe: Grammaticalization paths, verbal semantics, Chaos Theory, Cognitive Linguistics, semantic maps
References

Alligood K., Suaer T., York J. 1997. Chaos: An introduction to dynamic systems. New York.

Andrason A. 2016. A complex system of complex predicates: Tense, taxis, aspect and mood in Basse Mandinka from a grammaticalization and cognitive perspective. [PhD Diss., University of Stellenbosch]. Stellenbosch.

Auyang S. 1998a. How science comprehends chaos. [Paper presented at the Department of the History of Science Harvard University. February 23, 1998; www.creatingtechnology.org/essays/chaos.htm].

Auyang S. 1998b. Foundations of complex-system theories. Cambridge.

Auyang S. 2000. Mind in everyday life and cognitive science. Cambridge.

Bickhard M. 2011. Systems and process metaphysics. – Hooker C. (ed.). Philosophy of complex systems. Amsterdam: 91–104.

Bishop R. 2011. Metaphysical and epistemological issues in complex systems. – Hooker C. (ed.). Philosophy of complex systems. Amsterdam: 105–136.

Blanchard P., Devaney R., Hall G. 2006. Differential equations. London.

Bybee J., Perkins R., Pagliuca W. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Chicago.

Casselman B. 2005. Picturing the horseshoe map. – Notices of the American Mathematical Society 52.5: 518–519.

Cilliers P. 1998. Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London.

Cilliers P. 2005. Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. – Theory, Culture and Society 22.5: 255–267.

Cilliers P. (ed.). 2007a. Thinking complexity. Mansfield.

Cilliers P. (ed.). 2007b. Reframing complexity. Mansfield.

Cilliers P. et al. 2013. Complexity, modeling, and natural resource management. – Ecology and Society 18.3: 1–12.

Dahl Ö. 2000a. The tense and aspect systems of European languages in a typological perspec­tive. – Dahl Ö. (ed.). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: 3–25.

Dahl Ö. (ed.). 2000b. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin.

Devaney R. 1989. An introduction to chaotic dynamical systems. Redwood City.

Elaydi S. 1999. Discrete chaos. Boca Raton.

Gleick J. 1987. CHAOS: Making a new science. New York.

Heine B., Claudi U., Hünnemeyer F. 1991a. From cognition to grammar. Evidence from African languages. – Traugott E., Heine B. (eds.). Approaches to grammaticalization. [vol. 2]. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 149–187.

Heine B., Claudi U., Hünnemeyer F. 1991b. Grammaticalization. A conceptual framework. Chicago.

Heine B., Kuteva T. 2006. The changing languages of Europe. Oxford.

Heine B., Kuteva T. 2007. The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford.

Hooker C. 2011. Introduction to philosophy of complex systems: A. – Hooker C. (ed.). Phi­losophy of complex systems. Amsterdam: 3–90.

Hopper P., Traugott E. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge.

Ivancevic V., Ivancevic T. 2008. Complex nonlinearity: Chaos, phase transitions, topology change, and path integrals. Berlin.

Narrog H., Heine B. (eds.). 2011. The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford.

Newmeyer F. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge.

Prigogine I. 2009. ¿Tan solo una ilusión? Barcelona.

Schlindwein S.L., Ison R. 2007. Human knowing and perceived complexity: Implications for system practise. – Cilliers P. (ed.). Thinking complexity. Mansfield: 229–238.

Schneider E., Sagan D. 2009. La termodinámica de la vida [Into the cool: Energy flow, ther­modynamics, and life, 2006, Chicago]. Barcelona.

Schrödinger E. 2008. ¿Qué es la vida? Barcelona.

Shub M. 2005. What is … a horseshoe? – Notices of the American Mathematical Society 52.5: 516–517.

Smith P. 1998. Explaining chaos. Cambridge.

Strogatz S. 1994. Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: With applications to physics, biology, chem­istry, and engineering. New York.

Traugott E. 2001. Legitimate counterexamples to unidirectionality. [Paper presented at Freiburg University, October 17th 2001; http://www.stanford.edu/~traugott/ traugott.html].

Wagensberg J. 2007. Ideas sobre la complejidad del mundo. Barcelona.

Wagensberg J. 2010. Las raíces triviales de lo fundamental. Barcelona.

Werndl C. 2009. What are the new implications of chaos for unpredictability? – British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 195–220.