DIRECT SPEECH AND DIVERSITY OF VOICES IN SELECTED LETTERS OF CICERO TO ATTICUS I (DIRECT SPEECH)

Jana Mikulová

Abstrakt

This paper examines Cicero’s use and introduction of direct speech in nine selected letters to Atticus. It shows that despite the informal traits found in the letters, Cicero is not innovative in his choice of means to introduce direct speech. The paper also notes transitional zones on the margin of the domain of direct speech and the interplay of intervening voices. In this way, it contributes to improving the knowledge of direct speech in classical Latin, which is a necessary starting point for research into its development. The analysis is divided into two parts. This part is aimed at the theoretical background, use and introduction of direct speech in the letters to Atticus.

Słowa kluczowe: direct speech, Cicero, Latin, reported speech, quotation
References

Bonami O., Godard D. 2008. On the syntax of direct quotation in French. – 15th International Conference on HPSG. Stanford: 358–377. [available at: halshs-00751080].

Bolkestein A.M. 1990. Sentential complements in functional grammar: Embedded predi­cations, propositions, utterances in Latin. – Vet C., Bolkestein A.M., Nuyts J. (eds.). Layers and levels of representation in language theory: A functional view. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: 71–100.

Bolkestein A.M. 1996. Reported speech in Latin. – Janssen T., Wurff W. van der (eds.). Re­ported speech. Amsterdam: 121–140.

Davidson D. 2001. Inquiries into truth and interpretation. [2nd edition]. Oxford.

Garcea A. 2002. L’interaction épisolaire entre dialogue in absentia et in praesentia chez Ci­céron. – Bolkestein A.M. et al. (eds.). Theory and description in Latin linguistics: Selected papers from the XIth International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Amsterdam, June 24–29, 2001. Amsterdam: 123–138.

Grepl M. 1988. Reprodukce prvotních výpovědí. – Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské univerzity A.36: 51–57.

Güldemann T. 2008. Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin, New York.

Güldemann T. 2012. Thetic speaker-instantiating quotative indexes as a cross-linguistic type. – Alphen I. van, Buchstaller I. (eds.). Quotative: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: 117–142.

Hodgson L. 2017. Res Publica and the Roman republic. ‘Without body or form’. Oxford.

Keizer E. 2009. The interpersonal level in English: Reported speech. – Linguistics 47.4: 845–866.

Kieckers E. 1919. Zum ‘pleonastischen’ inquit. – Glotta 10.3: 200–209.

Library of Latin texts – Series A. 2016. Turnhout. [online database, available at: http://apps.brepolis.net/BrepolisPortal/default.aspx].

Library of Latin texts – Series B. 2016. Turnhout. [online database, available at: http://apps.brepolis.net/BrepolisPortal/default.aspx].

Molinelli P. 2010. From verbs to interactional discourse markers: The pragmaticalization of Latin rogo, quaeso. – Calboli G., Cuzzolin P. (eds.). Papers on grammar XI. Roma: 181–192.

Pinkster H. 2015. The Oxford Latin syntax. [vol. 1: The simple clause]. Oxford.

Risselada R. 1989. Latin illocutionary parentheticals. – Lavency M., Longrée D. (eds.). Actes du cinquième Colloque de Linguistique Latine. Louvain-la-Neuve/Borzée, 31 mars – 4 avril 1989. [= Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 15]. Louvain-la-Neuve: 367–378.

Rosén H. 2009. Coherence, sentence modification, and sentence-part modification: The con­tribution of particles. – Baldi P., Cuzzolin P. (eds.). New perspectives on historical Latin syntax. [vol. 1 : Syntax of the sentence]. Berlin, New York: 317–442.

Rosén H. 2013. About non-direct discourse: Another look at its parameters in Latin. – Journal of Latin Linguistics 12.2: 231–263.

Shackleton-Bailey D.R. 1960. Towards a text of Cicero ‘Ad Atticum’. Cambridge.

Shackleton-Bailey D.R. (ed. and transl.). 1966. Cicero’s letters to Atticus. [vol. 5]. Cambridge.

Shackleton-Bailey D.R. (ed. and transl.). 1968a. Cicero’s letters to Atticus. [vol. 3]. Cambridge.

Shackleton-Bailey D.R. (ed. and transl.). 1968b. Cicero’s letters to Atticus. [vol. 4]. Cambridge.

Spevak O. 2010. Constituent order in Classical Latin prose. Amsterdam.

Spronck S. 2012. Minds divided: Speaker attitudes in quotatives. – Alphen I. van, Buchstaller I. (eds.). Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam, Phila­delphia: 71–116.

Sznajder L. 2001. Discours indirect et dépendance syntaxique. – Moussy C. (ed.). De lingua Latina novae quaestiones: Actes du Xe Colloque International de Linguistique Latine, Paris-Sèvres, 19–23 avril 1999. Louvain: 609–626.

TLL = Thesaurus linguae Latinae. 2004. [3rd edition, dvd-rom]. Leipzig.

Vandelanotte L. 2004. Deixis and grounding in speech and thought representation. – Journal of Pragmatics 36: 489–520.

Vandelanotte L. 2009. Speech and thought representation in English. Berlin, New York.

Vries M. de 2008. The representation of language within language: A syntactico-pragmatic typology of direct speech. – Studia Linguistica 62.1: 39–77.

Winstedt E.O. (ed. and transl.). 1912. Cicero. Letters to Atticus. In three volumes. [vol. 1]. London, New York.

Czasopismo ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.
Pierwotną i jedyną formą czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna.