Using online practice tests based on authentic short stories in English to enhance student language skills

Gergana Petkova,

Vanya Ivanova

Abstrakt

The purpose of this article is to explain the principle behind practice tests based on authentic short stories in English, describe their construction, and outline their ap­plication which aims to increase student knowledge and skills in a foreign language. The methodology employs digital practice tests created following a set of criteria for test development based on Bloom’s taxonomy. The results of the study indicate certain benefits of the practice tests: short stories introduce new vocabulary and the tests provide reinforcement, which both facilitates and motivates the students.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This paper is supported by grant MU21-FMI-015 from the NPD at the University of Plovdiv “Paisii Hilendarski”, financed by the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science.

Słowa kluczowe: e-learning, practice tests, digital tests, short stories, test criteria
References

ALTE. 2018. Guidelines for the development of language for specific purposes tests. A supplement to the manual for language test development and examining. [available at: https://www.alte.org/resources/Documents/6093%20LSP%20Supplement%20-%20WEB.pdf, accessed: 23 February 2022].

Bloom B.S., Engelhart M.D., Furst E.J., Hill W.H., Krathwohl D.R. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. [Handbook 1: Cognitive domain]. New York: David McKay Company.

Carr N. 2011. Designing and analyzing language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ceylan Н.О. 2016. Using short stories in reading skills class. – Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 232: 311–315.

Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Davidson F., Lynch B. 2002. Testcraft: A teacher’s guide to writing and using language test specifications. London, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Douglas D. 2010. Understanding language testing. London: Hodder-Arnold.

Dunlosky J., Rawson K., Marsh E., Nathan M., Willingham D. 2013. Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. – Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14.1: 4–58.

Eustace J., Pathak P., Muntean C.H. 2014. Practice testing: Enhancing student learning with e-assessment. – 13th Annual information technology & telecommunications conference. [available at: http://trap.ncirl.ie/1302/, accessed: 23 February 2022].

Fulcher G., Davidson F. 2007. Language testing and assessment. An advanced resource book. London, New York: Routledge.

Ivanova V. 2011. Construction and evaluation of achievement tests in English. – Totkov G., Koychev I. (eds.). Sbornik ot Chetvarta natsionalna konferentsiya “Obrazovanieto v informatsionnoto onstestvo”, 26–27 May 2011. [Proceedings of the “Education in the information society” 4th national conference]. Plovdiv: Association for the Development of the Information Society and the Institute of Mathematics and Informatics at the

Bulgarian Academy of Science: 276–285. [available at: http://sci-gems.math.bas.bg/jspui/bitstream/10525/1554/1/adis-may-2011–276p-285p.pdf, accessed: 23 February 2022].

Ivanova V. 2020. Saki – six short stories and six tests. [= Language Trainer]. Plovdiv: Koala Press.

Ivanova V., Terzieva T. 2016. Criteria for the construction of tests for language assessment and evaluation. – Proceedings of the MIDOC doctoral conference in mathematics and informatics. Sofia: “St. Kliment Ohridski” University Press: 58–65.

Karpicke J., Blunt J. 2011. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. – Science 331.6018: 772–775.

McDaniel M., Wildman K.M., Anderson J.L. 2012. Using quizzes to enhance summative-assessment performance in a web-based class: An experimental study. – Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 1.1: 18–26.

Munro H.H. 1993. The collected short stories of Saki. Suffolk: Wordsworth Editions.

Roediger H.L., Karpicke J. 2006. Test-enhanced learning – taking memory tests improves long-term retention. – Association for Psychological Science 17.3: 249–256.

Roediger H.L., Agarwal P., McDaniel M., McDermott K. 2011a. Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: Long-term improvements from quizzing. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 17.4: 382–395.

Roediger H.L., McDermott K., McDaniel M. 2011b. Using testing to improve learning and memory. – Gernsbacher M.A., Pew R.W., Hough L.M., Pomerantz J.R. (eds.). Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society. New York: Worth Publishers: 65–74.

Stoyanova F. 1996. Testologiya za uchiteli. [Testology for teachers]. Sofia: Atika.