A Revived Sāṃkhyayoga Tradition in Modern India

Marzenna Jakubczak


This paper discusses the phenomenon of Kāpil Maṭh (Madhupur, India), a Sāṃkhyayoga āśrama founded in the early twentieth century by the charismatic Bengali scholar-monk Swāmi Hariharānanda Ᾱraṇya (1869–1947). While referring to Hariharānanda’s writings I will consider the idea of the re-establishment of an extinct spiritual lineage. I shall specify the criteria for identity of this revived Sāṃkhyayoga tradition by explaining why and on what assumptions the modern reinterpretation of this school can be perceived as continuation of the thought of Patañjali and Īśvarakṛṣṇa. The starting point is, however, the question whether it is possible at all to re-establish a philosophical tradition which had once broken down and disappeared for centuries. In this context, one ought to ponder if it is likely to revitalise the same line of thinking, viewing, philosophy-making and practice in accordance with the theoretical exposition of the right insight achieved by an accomplished teacher, a master, the founder of a “new”revived tradition declared to maintain a particular school identity. Moreover, I refer to a monograph of Knut A. Jacobsen (2018) devoted to the tradition of Kāpil Maṭh interpreted as a typical product of the nineteenth-century Bengali renaissance.

Słowa kluczowe: Indian modern spirituality, Yoga, Sāṃkhya, Kāpil Maṭh, Hariharānanda Ᾱraṇya / współczesna duchowość Indii, joga, sankhja, Hariharānanda Ᾱraṇya

Ᾱraṇya, Swāmī Hariharānanda, A Unique Travelogue. An Allegorical Exploration of Spirituality and Yoga, trans. S. Guha, Madhupur 2001.

Ᾱraṇya, Swāmī Hariharānanda, Progressive and Practical Sāṃkhya-Yoga, A. Chatterjee (ed.), Madhupur 2003.

Ᾱraṇya, Swāmī Hariharānanda, Sāṃkhya Across the Millenniums, A. Chatterjee (ed.), Madhupur 2005.

Ᾱraṇya, Swāmī Hariharānanda, The Doctrine of Karma (Karmatattva). A Philosophical and Scientific Analysis of the Theory of Karma, trans. I. Guptā, Madhupur 2008.

Ᾱraṇya, Swāmī Hariharānanda, Yoga Philosophy of Patañjali with Bhāsvatī, trans. P.N. Mukerji, Kolkata 2000.

Aśvaghosa’s Buddhacarita. A Complete Sanskrit Text Supplemented by the Tibetan Version and Chinese Translation, trans. E.H. Johnston, Delhi 1972 (reprint of the 1936 Lahore edition).

Bronkhorst J., Sāṃkhya in the Abhidharmakośa Bhāṣya, “Journal of Indian Philosophy” 1997, vol. 25, pp. 393–400.

Deutsch E., Knowledge and the Tradition Text in Indian Philosophy, [in:] Interpreting Across Boundaries: New Essays in Comparative Philosophy, G.J. Larson, E. Deutsch (eds.), Delhi 1989, pp. 165–173.

Dharmamegha, Swāmī Āraṇya, So Have We Heard (Iti Śuśruma), trans. I. Gupta, Kolkata 2003.

In the Buddha’s Words: An Anthology of Discourses from the Pāli Canon, Bhikku Bodhi (ed.), Somerville 2005.

Jacobsen K.A., In Kapila’s Cave: A Sāṁkhya-Yoga Renaissance in Bengal, [in:] Theory and Practice of Yoga. Essays in Honour of Gerald James Larson, K.A. Jacobsen (ed.), Leiden 2005, pp. 333–349.

Jacobsen K.A., Yoga in Modern Hinduism: Hariharānanda raṇya and Sāṁkhyayoga, London–New York 2018.

Jakubczak M., Why Didn’t Siddhartha Gautama Become a Sāṃkhya Philosopher, After All?, [in:] Hindu and Buddhist Ideas in Dialogue. Self and No-Self, I. Kuznetsova, J. Ganeri, Ch. Ram-Prasad (eds.), Farnham 2012, pp. 29–45.

Kent S.A., Early Sāṃkhya in the Buddhacarita, “Philosophy East and West” 1982, vol. 32, pp. 259–278.

Kimball J., The Soteriological Role of the ṛṣi Kapila, According to the Yuktidīpikā, “Journal of Indian Philosophy” 2013, vol. 41(6), pp. 603–614.

Krishna D., Is Īśvarakṛṣṇa’s Sāṁkhya-Kārikā Really Sāṁkhyan?, [in:] idem, Indian Philosophy. A Counter Perspective, New Delhi 1996, pp. 144–155.

Larson G.J., An Old Problem Revisited: The Relation between Sāṁkhya, Yoga and Buddhism, “Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik” 1989, vol. 15, pp. 129–146.

Larson G.J., Classical Yoga as Neo-Sāṃkhya, [in:] Asiatische Studien / Études Asiatiques, vol. 52, 1999, pp. 723–732.

Larson G.J., The “Tradition Text” in Indian Philosophy for Doing History of Philosophy in India, [in:] The Aestethic Turn: Reading Eliot Deutsch on Comparative Philosophy, R.T. Ames (ed.), Peru 2000, pp. 59–69.

Life of the Buddha by Aśvaghoṣa, trans. P. Olivelle, New York 2008.

Maas P.A., A Concise Historiography of Classical Yoga Philosophy, [in:] Periodization and Historiography of Indian Philosophy, E. Franco (ed.), Vienna 2013, pp. 53–90.

Maas P.A., From Theory to Poetry: The Reuse of Patañjali’s Yogaśāstra in Māgha’s Śiśupālavadha, [in:] Adaptive Reuse: Aspects of Creativity in South Asian Cultural History, E. Freschi, P.A. Maas (eds.), Wiesbaden 2017, pp. 29–62.

Maharaj A., Yogic Mindfulness: Hariharānanda raṇya’s Quasi-Buddhistic Interpretation of Smṛti in Patañjali’s Yogasūtra I.20, “Journal of Indian Philosophy” 2013, vol. 41, pp. 57–78.

Mahāthera P.V., Buddhist Meditation in Theory and Practice. A General Exposition According to the Pāli Canon of the Therevāda School, Colombo 1962.

Majjhima Nikāya, [in:] The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha. A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikāya, B. Ñāṇamoli, B. Bodhi (eds., trans.), Boston 1995.

Osto D., No-Self in Sāṁkhya: A Comparative Look at Classical Sāṁkhya and Theravāda Buddhism, “Philosophy East and West” 2018, vol. 68(1), pp. 201–222.

Ruzsa F., Sāṁkhya: Dualism without Substances, [in:] Indian Epistemology and Metaphysics, J. Tuske (ed.), New York 2019, pp. 153–181.

Sāṃkhya: A Dualist Tradition in Indian Philosophy. Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, vol. 4, G.J. Larson, R.S. Bhattacharya (eds.), Delhi 1987.

Sāṃkhyakārikā, trans. G.J. Larson, [in:] G.J. Larson, Classical Sāṁkhya. An Interpretation of Its History and Meaning, Delhi 1979, pp. 255–277.

Shevchenko D., Natural Liberation in the Sāṃkhyakārikā and Its Commentaries, “Journal of Indian Philosophy” 2017, vol. 45, pp. 863–892.

Kwartalnik "Studia Religiologica" ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.

Pierwotną wersją czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna publikowana w Internecie.