Call for Papers
A call for papers to be published in journals that have formed a thematic coalition
Culture and organisations in times of pandemic
Details in PDF file: 
Polish version English version
See full annoucement: https://www.ejournals.eu/ZM/menu/1094/
.jpg)
About Journal
The "Media Management" Journal is the first Polish reviewed scientific on-line journal, which addresses the problems of media management. The aim of the journal is to examine and describe theoretical and practical issues associated with managing the media, information, advertising and media-connected institutions.
We would like to invite all researchers who deal with the following issues to submit publications:
▪ management of a media company
▪ public and commercial media in the era of information society
▪ the development of information and communication technologies
▪ media and the challenges of market conditions
▪ convergence and digitalization processes in the media
▪ the change in the structure of the media industry
▪ the information revolution and growing expectations of customers
▪ social media andthe revolution in communication
▪ norms and values in contemporary media
Please submit papers to:
Prof. dr hab. Bogusław Nierenberg: boguslaw.nierenberg@uj.edu.pl
Dr Malwina Popiołek: m.popiolek@uj.edu.pl
Dr Anna Modzelewska: anna.modzelewska@uj.edu.pl
Review procedures in the „Media management” journal
1. Papers submitted for publication in the “Media management” journal go through a pre-selection carried out by the editorial board, after which they can be accepted for review, rejected or sent back to the author with suggestions of required corrections or other additions. Selection rules are included in the "Instructions for Authors".
2. To evaluate each publication, the editorial board appoints at least two independent reviewers from outside the unit. Reviewers are chosen according to the subject of the proposed article. They should be expert in the area of the scientific text, and their rank should be proven by significant scientific achievements. The editorial board ensures that they are people who have a reputation of reliable reviewers.
3. The editorial board cannot put any pressure or direct suggestions to referee, neither before making contract nor during the review process.
4. Review must be given in paper with explicit approval or rejection of the article.
5. Review procedure is carried out in strict confidence. Authors and reviewers do not know their identity (double blind review process).
6. After collecting all reviews of the paper, the editorial board decides to assign the article for printing, based on received opinions.
Instructions for Authors
Selection rules of the articles submitted to “Media management” journal
1. Papers submitted to “Media management” journal go through a pre-selection carried out by editorial board and concludes whether the article complies with the journal profile. The editorial board ensure whether the paper meets at least one of the following criteria:
a. being a creative explanation of the research problem;
b. being a critical review of Polish or foreign research state in particular subject;
c. promotes Polish or foreign research results in congress language;
d. is based on own research study, and provides an original scientific source.
2. In justified circumstances, the editorial board may accept an article that does not meet the criteria above.
3. The paper approved by the editorial board is passed to two independent scientific reviewers. Reviewers’ duties are:
a. evaluation of the article (in particular if: the title is consistent with content, research methods were used properly, results are scientifically important, the selection of sources and references were sufficient enough);
b. revision of the paper in accordance to the regulations of copyright;
c. opinion about formal aspects of the paper (language correctness and writing technique skills).
DUTIES OF AUTHORS
Reporting standards: Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. The paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. The fabrication of results and making of fraudulent or inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and may cause rejection or retraction of a manuscript or a published article.
Originality and plagiarism: Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others they need to be cited or quoted. Plagiarism and fraudulent data is not acceptable.
Data access retention: Authors may be asked to provide the raw data for an editorial review, should be prepared to provide public access to such data, and should be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication of their paper.
Multiple or concurrent publication: In general, authors should not publish a manuscript describing essentially the same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Authorship of the manuscript: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the report study. All those who have made contributions should be listed as co-authors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Acknowledgement of sources: The proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. The authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the scope of the reported work.
Fundamental errors in published works: When the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
