Social agency and symbolic structure. The case of social work practice in Poland

Andrzej Niesporek,

Tomasz Warczok

Abstrakt

Changes in Poland, being a result of transformation of economic system open the necessity of formation new social policy and new social assistance system, including professional social work. Professional character of social workers job is being constructed not only by law or institutional regulations, but through everyday activities undertaken by social workers. One of the consequences of these practices is the strategy of informal evaluation and classification of welfare clients. To understand the social workers daily professional practice is important to identify strategies, arguments and language codes lying behind them. We try to interpret this kind of social workers’ activity refer to different theoretical perspectives.

Słowa kluczowe: social work, social agency, reflexivity, apparent action
References

Adams M. (2006). Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: Towards an understanding of contemporary identity? Sociology, 40 (3): 511–528.

Alexander C.J. (1988). The New Theoretical Movement, in: N.J. Smelser (ed.) Handbook of Sociology. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA: 77–101.

Alexander C.J. (2003). The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Alexander C.J. (2007). The meaning ful construction of inequality and the struggles against it: A strong program approach to how social boundaries change. Cultural Sociology, 1 (1): 23–30.

Archer S.M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Archer M. (1988). Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge.

Archer S.M. (2007). Making Our Way Through the World. Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Bloor D. (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Boltanski L., Thévenot L. (1991). De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur. Gallimard, Paris.

Boltanski L., Thévenot L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2 (3): 359–378.

Bourdieu P. (1984). Homo Academicus. Éditions de Minuit, Paris.

Bourdieu P. (1989). La noblesse dEtat: Grands corps et grandes écoles. Éditions de Minuit, Paris.

Bourdieu P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la torie de laction. Le Seuil, Paris.

Collins R. (2004). Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Dean M. (1997). Sociology after society, in: D. Owen (ed.), Sociology after Postmodernism. SAGE Publications, London.

Dawe A. (1970). The two sociologies. British Journal of Sociology, 21 (2): 207–218.

Dietz C., Thompson J. (2004). Rethinking boundaries: Ethical dilemmas in the social worker client relationship. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 15 (2): 1–24.

DiMaggio P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 263–287.

Douglas M. (1966). Purity and Danger. An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. Routledge, London.

Durkheim E. (2001). Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Durkheim E., Mauss M. (1963). Primitive Classification. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Freitag M. (2002). The dissolution of society within the social. European Journal of Social Theory, 5 (2): 175–198.

Granosik M. (2006). Profesjonalny wymiar pracy socjalnej. Wydawnictwo Śląsk, Katowice.

Howe D. (2009). A Brief Introduction to Social Work Theory. Palgrafe MacMillan, New York.

Lamont M. (1992). Money, Morals and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lamont M. (2000). The Dignity of Working Man: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class and Immigration. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

Lamont M. (2009). How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Harvard University Press, Harvard.

Lamont M., Fournier M. (red.) (1992). Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lamont M., Thévenot L. (red.) (2000). Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Polities and Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Lash S., Urry J. (1994). Economies of Signs and Space, vol. 26. Published in association with Theory, Culture & Society, Sage Publications, London.

Lutyński J. (1977). Dziania pozorne. Kultura i Speczeństwo, 2: 69–78.

Payne M. (2002). Social work theories and reflective practice, in: R. Adams, L. Dominelli, M. Payne (eds.), Social Work: Themes, Issues and Critical Debates. Palgrave MacMillan, New York.

Reamer F.G. (1993). The Philosophical Foundations of Social Work. Columbia University Press, New York.

Reamer F.G. (2003). Boundary issues in social work: Managing dual relationships. Social Work, 48 (1): 121–133.

Ritzer G. (1990). Micro-macro linkage in sociological theory: Applying a metatheoretical tool, in: G. Ritzer (ed.), Frontiers of Social Theory. The New Syntheses. Columbia University Press, New York.

Sewell W.H. Jr. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98 (1): 1–29. Published by The University of Chicago Press Stable URL; http://www.jstor.org/stable/2781191.

Silber I.F. (2003). Pragmatic sociology as cultural sociology. Beyond repertoire theory? European Journal of Social Theory, 6 (4): 427–449.

Swidler A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51: 273–286.

Touraine A. (1998). Sociology without Society. Current Sociology, 46 (2): 119–143.

Trawkowska D. (2007). Dziania pozorne w pomocy specznej. Przypadek (i  przypaość) pracy socjalnej. Problemy Polityki Specznej, 10: 129–147.

Urry J. (2000). Sociology beyond Societies. Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century. Routledge–London–New York.

Wacquant L. (1989). Towards a reflexive sociology. A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. Sociological Theory, 7 (1): 26–63.

Wacquant L. (1995). Durkheim et Bourdieu. Le socle commun et ses fissures. Critique: 579–580.

Widick R. (2004). Flesh and the free market. (On taking Bourdieu to the options exchange), in: D.L. Swartz, V. Zolberg (eds.), After Bourdieu. Influence Critique, Elaboration. Springer, Boston: 193–238.

Wuggenig U. (2008). Paradoxical Crtitique; http://eipcp.net/transversal/0808/wuggenig/en (accessed: 24.09.2012).