Planning and realization control of research projects

Dorota Kuchta

Abstrakt

In the paper a new approach to research projects planning and management is proposed. It is substantially different from the traditional methods and resembles more the agile methods used in IT projects. It takes into account the much more greater dimension of uncertainty inherent to research projects as compared with other types of projects. It allows a project to be broken if the analysis shows that the benefit/cost relation does no longer justify the project continuation. The focus of the method lies on an generalized tasks description, consisting of a comprehensive list of undetermined, unknown or uncertain task attributes and task dependencies, with an explanation clarifying the nature or the cause of the lack of information/uncertainty. The description should be updated in the course of the project. The proposed approach is applied to a real world research project where a lot of changes were necessary and traditional project management methods proved to be inefficient.

Słowa kluczowe: research project, project risk, project uncertainty.
References

Artigues C., Michelon P., Reusser S. (2003), Insertion Techniques for Static and Dynamic Resource Constrained Project Scheduling, “European Journal of Operational Research”, Vol. 149(2), p. 249–267.

Courtot H. (1998), La gestion de risques das les projets, Economica, Paris.

Energy Facility Contractors Group (2010), Project Management in Research & Development – White Paper, Project Management Working Group.

Estermann T., Claeys-Kulik A.L. (2013), Financially Sustainable Universities Full Costing: Progress and Practice, European Universities Association.

Haugan G.T. (2002), Effective Work Breakdown Structures, Management Concepts.

Jordan G.B., Hage J., Mote J., Helper B. (2005), Investigating Differences among Research Projects and Implications for Managers, “R&D Management”, Vol. 35(5), p. 501–511.

Kidd J.B. (2007), A Comparison between the VERT Program and Other Methods of Project Duration Estimation, Omega, Vol. 15(2), p. 129–134. 

Kuchta D. (2011), Metody planowania projektów badawczych, „Zeszyty Naukowe – Wyższa Szkoła Oficerska Wojsk Lądowych im. gen. T. Kościuszki”, Vol. 43(4), p. 332–341.

Kuchta D., Janczura M. (2012), Proactive and Reactive Scheduling with Fuzzy Duration Times, Uncertainty Modeling in Knowledge Engineering and Decision Making: Proceedings of the 10th International FLINS Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 26–29 August 2012, C. Kahraman, E.E. Kerre, F.T. Bozbura (eds.), p. 495–500.

Kuchta D., Skowron D. (2013), Selection of Concepts of Research and Development Project Management, submitted to “R&D Management Journal”.

Pritsker A.A.B. (1966), GERT: Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique RM-4973-NASA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Contract No. NASr-21. Retrieved on the 8th of May 2010.

Turner J.R., Cochrane R.A. (1993), The Goals and Methods Matrix: Coping with Projects with Ill-defined Goals and/or Methods of Achieving Them, “International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 11(2), p. 93–102.

Wysocki R.K., McGary R. (2009), Effective Project Management: Traditional, Adaptive, Extreme, third ed., Indiana, Wiley Publishing, Inc.

http://www.portal.pwr.wroc.pl/fakty,242.dhtml (retrieved: 23.03.2013).

Kwartalnik ukazuje się w sposób ciągły on-line.
Pierwotną wersją czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna publikowana w internecie.