Agency and communion in LinkedIn professional candidates’ profiles. Bias in recruitment process?

Michał Chmiel

Abstrakt
Agency and communion are two content dimensions present of person perception that play a dominant role in making decisions of social nature. Apart from general favourability towards communion when forming judgements about others, people have a tendency to assess more positively persons who reveal stereotypical content categories; men – agency, women – communion. A few research papers offer systematisation of possible biases hiring professionals may exhibit during research and selection (R&S) process and basing the R&S on information found in social media is not immune to those biases. Two experiments with 2 × 2 design (N = 147) were conducted to test whether stereotype-consistent information presented in LinkedIn profiles influences candidates’ assessment. The findings suggest hiring professionals are less biased than lay people and the direction of the observed tendencies is contrary to previously hypothesised.
Słowa kluczowe: recruitment and selection, LinkedIn, person perception, agency and communion
References

Bakan, D. (1966). The Duality of Human Existence. ReadingPennsylvania: Addison-
-Wesley.

Black, L.S., & Johnson, A.F. (2012). Employers’ use of social networking sites in the selection process. Journal of Social Media in Society1(1), 7–29.

Brown, V.R., & Vaughn, E.D. (2011). The writing on the (Facebook) wall: The use of social networking sites in hiring decisions. Journal of Business Psychology, 26(2), 219–225.

Caers, R., & Castelyns, V. (2010). LI and Facebook in Belgium: The influences and biases of social network sites in recruitment and selection procedures. Social Science Computer Review29(4), 437–448.

Chiang, J.K., & Suen, H. (2015). Self-presentation and hiring recommendations in online communities: Lessons from LI. Computers in Human Behavior, 48(July), 516–524.

Damnjanović, D., Matović, V., Kostić, S., & Okanović, M. (2012). The role of the LinkedIn social media in building the personal image. Management Journal for Theory and Practice Management, (65), 15–23.

Davison, H.K., Maraist, C., & Bing, M.N. (2011). Friend or foe? The promise and pitfalls of using social networking sites for HR decisions. Journal of Business Psychology, 26(2), 153–159.

Furnham, A., & Paltzer, S. (2010). The portrayal of man and women in television advertisements: An updated review of 30 studies published since 2000. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology51(3), 216–236.

Gen Y’d, Recruit on MySpace.com? Better Be Careful! (2006), retrieved from: http://www.ere.net/blogs/gen_yd/C0CA0C1F9171B83E64E8FB7FB466DC84.asp [accessed: 21.09.2006] (article no longer available).

Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P.M. (1999). Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Evolution and Cognition Series ABC Research Group. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E.F., & Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 431–462.

Jobvite (2014). Social Networking Survey, retreived from: https://www.jobvite.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Jobvite_SocialRecruiting_Survey2014.pdf [accessed: 17.10.2015].

Kluemper, D. & Rosen, P. (2009). Future employment selection methods: Evaluating social networking web sites. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(6), 567–580.

Kossowska, M. (2003). Różnice indywidualne potrzebie poznawczego domknięcia. Przegląd Psychologiczny46(4), 355374.

Kossowska, M., Hanusz, K., & Trejtowicz, M. (2012). Skrócona wersja Skali Potrzeby Poznawczego Domknięcia: Dobór pozycji walidacja skali. Psychologia Społeczna, 7(1), 89−99.

Kruglanski, A., & Webster, D. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: „Seizing” and „freezing”. Psychological Review, 103(02), 263–283.

Marlowe, C.M., Schneider, S.L., & Nelson, C.E. (1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased? Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 11–21.

Mesquita, B., Barrett, L.F., & Smith, E. (eds.) (2010). The Mind in Context. New York: Guilford.

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (2010). The situated person. In L. Feldman-Barrett, B. Mesquita, E. Smith (eds.), Mind in Context. New York: Guilford, pp. 149–173.

Robles, M. (2012). Executive perceptions of the top 10 soft skills needed in today’s workplace. Business Communication Quarterly75(4), 453–465.

Sameen, S., & Cornelius, S. (2015). Social networking sites and hiring: How social media profiles influence hiring decisions. Journal Of Business Studies Quarterly, 7(1), 27–35.

Skrzypczyk, M. (2015). Stereotypy języku reklamy. Wpływ dopasowania treści komunikatu presupozycyjnego do płci odbiorcy na skuteczność przekazu marketingowego. Unpublished master thesis manuscript. Kraków: WZiKS UJ.

Smith, E.R., & Semin, G.R. (2007). Situated social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 132–135.

Webster, D.M., & Kruglanski, A.W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062.

Wojciszke, B. (2010). Sprawczość wspólnotowość. Podstawowe wymiary spostrzegania społecznego. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Wojciszke, B., & Baryła, W. (2006). Perspektywa sprawcy biorcy spostrzeganiu siebie innych. Psychologia Społeczna1(1), 9–32.

Wojciszke, B., Brycz, H., & Borkenau, P. (1993). Effects of information content and evaluative extremity on positivity and negativity biasesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology64(3), 327–335.

Kwartalnik JAGIELLONIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT ukazuje się w sposób ciągły online.

Pierwotną wersją czasopisma jest wersja elektroniczna publikowana kwartalnie w internecie.